User:Zzyzx11/Archive22

This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
The archives Archives
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 		This user is an administrator

Current time: Tuesday, May 14, 2024, 08:36 (UTC)
Last edit: May 26, 2022, 10:14 (UTC) by MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)


Shady editing of 2008-2009 NFL Playoffs page

Please quit rolling back content simply because you are unaware of a common-knowledge controversy and unwilling to spent 10 seconds on a Google search to verify that controversy. For the record: http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/01/18/controversy-surrounds-non-pass-interference-call-as-eagles-lose/ (among dozens of other reputable links discussing the controversy. Feel free to add the footnote.65.114.67.152 (talk) 07:09, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

As per our policies on listed on Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Reliable sources, Wikipedia:Citing sources, etc. the burden is on you to provide the necessary references and proper citations. It is not an admin's job trying to enforce these policies to look up Google and do the research for you. Regards. Zzyzx11 (talk) 15:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
[response from original poster] And yet, even after those sources were added, unjustifiable edits were made on the (false) grounds that the sources did not clearly say what they were attributed to as saying. Astonishingly, the CHANGE (a bizarre assertion that officials "ruled" a specific way through a non-call, when such a thing is mentioned nowhere in the sources nor is it logical) was the violation of these standards. I appreciate you volunteering to help make Wikipedia a better place. But in this case, you were in the wrong and overzealous. Regards, and thanks for the lively discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.114.67.152 (talk) 08:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/April 13

Thanks for making the changes. However, "Jallianwallah Bagh garden" is redundant. Coz Bagh means garden. Regards --59.182.84.185 (talk) 18:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Zzyzx11 (talk) 18:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


I know I am fretting too much, I would to point your attention to the discrepancy of the 13 April's On this Day here:


As you can in these successive anniversary hooks... Katyn Forest Massacre is clearly stated as Katyn Forest Massacre but the word massacre or Jalianwallah Bagh Massacre is missing. I am sure we can reword the shooting hook to make it clear and let the fact of "massacre" show.

Ex.


59.182.84.185 (talk) 18:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Super Bowl XL.png)

[Obligatory Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice] Kalel2007 (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Kalel2007 replaced the PNG File:Super Bowl XL.png with the SVG version File:Super Bowl XL.svg. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Begin, Carter and Sadat cropped.jpg

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons, the Wikimedia central media repository for all free media. The image was either individually tagged or was in a category tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:Begin, Carter and Sadat cropped.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#F8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC) --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Susan Boyle

"this is currently a highly visble page on a {{Current person}})" - It certainly is. Yet what reason is that to fully lock an article? SunCreator (talk) 10:45, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Because the protecting admin, User:Viridae, did not tag the page himself with {{pp-dispute}}, I took the liberty of doing it because, as I said, this is currently a highly visble page that is attraching a bunch of readers. I am only going by what Viridae entered in the deletion log, "thats what the talk page iis for, sort it out there"[1], and what appears in the page history to be an edit war between an anon ip and established users over whether to include the fact that she suffered from oxygen deprivation during birth.[2][3][4].
Since you have already posted your feelings on WP:RFPP and User talk:Viridae, I cannot help you any further. Viridae has posted comments on both that he is currently opposed to unprotection, and I prefer not to be involved and be in a wheel war with him. I also noticed that User:Rootology, another admin, made a legitimate comment on WP:RFPP that "If an IP is dueling a logged in user, then full is required. Semi is not intended to give logged-in users an edge."[5]
We have already had a Wheel War problem last August involving the Sarah Palin article where one admin thought there were too many edit disputes and BLP violations, and the other admin thought, as you probably do, that high-profile articles are watched too much that they can be reverted more expeditiously and thus do not need to be protected. Well that dispute eventually became an ARBCOM case where the Arbitration Committee acknowledged, among others, that the protection of BLPs and other articles of unusual prominence can be controversial, but that any admin such as Viridae, Rootology and myself should avoid wheel warring. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 16:28, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
UPDATE: Looks like somebody else unprotected the page at 17:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC). Keep in mind, under Wikipedia:Wheel war/Examples, the wheel war does not technically occur until the page is protected again. Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Inclusion of uninhabited sites under "Unincorporated communities" section

Greetings. I have stumbled across the San Bernardino County template many times over the years and have always wondered about the "Unincorporated communities" section. Over the past years, this section has expanded to include former communities that are currently uninhabited and now only exist in name. As a researcher of historic San Bernardino County desert communities, I am very familiar with the history of many of these settlements and can confirm that a good number of the locations listed in this section are completely abandoned. Here are some examples:

  • Bagdad : A former mining community that existed into the 1950's, all that remains here as of 2009 is a cemetery.
  • Cadiz : A former railroad water stop, all that remains here as of 2009 are building foundations.
  • Siberia : A former railroad water stop, all that remains here as of 2009 are building ruins of a former service station.

The question may come down to what qualifies a location as "unincorporated" -- from my understanding, it signifies that there is in fact, residents present at the location although their form of local government lacks formal incorporated or census-designated place (CDP) status. I encourage contributors to view County templates of other municipalities to see what the rule of thumb is for including uninhabited settlements/ghost towns in the "Unincorporated communities" section. One contributor has suggested to follow the Yuba County template example by creating a new section called "Ghost Towns". Please share your views and comments on the San Bernardino template talk page. Thanks! --Djrun (talk) 16:29, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

List of 81st Academy Awards In Memoriam tribute honorees

As someone with at least ten edits of 81st Academy Awards, you might want to comment at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of 81st Academy Awards In Memoriam tribute honorees/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Baltics

Any other sources has been removed from the article by the Estonian lobby in Wikipedia. The article has been under meditation: [6] but they even do not follow the meditation ruling and attacked the mediator instead. This is the legal definition of occupation from the Hague Conventions of 1907: Territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised. No country can occupy its own territory.--Dojarca (talk) 06:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
The link to Occupation of the Baltic states has been removed. Sorry for the delay, but as I have posted on the top of this talk page, I am busy in real life – and unfortunately, it seems that no other admin monitoring the main page wanted to touch this "with a ten foot pole". Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Could you please consider undoing your edit to the April 26 page. Dojarca's complaint comes strictly from the Soviet POV and the argument "cannot occupy its own territory" is simply erroneus here. Dojarca's latest actions have spawned an extensive discussion on Occupation of the Baltic states talk page. Oth (talk) 00:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

This was the first time that the Bronze Statue event appeared on OTD; the event happened only two years ago. So after looking at the heated discussion, and mediation rulings, I would now prefer to wait until something very, very definite is resolved. As stated elsewhere, main page templates defer to supporting pages, which in this case is the Occupation of the Baltic states article. We have until next year when the template is rotated back on the main page again. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

POTD

Hey, did you figure out that I was planning to schedule the Empire State Building photo on May 1, or did you independently pick it? What's funny is that I was just picking it because it was a labor-related picture for May Day; I didn't even realize that it was the anniversary of its opening. howcheng {chat} 21:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I figured out you were planning to schedule it. Because when you take that long to create the POTD, I sometimes wonder what has happened to you and I then start taking a look at your user contributions to see if you have been around recently. And after I noticed your edit on File:Old timer structural worker2.jpg, I wasn't sure you were aware of the anniversary so I went ahead and created the POTD templates. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 22:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of retired The Price Is Right pricing games

It looks like you were not notified of this AfD. Some of these tools below may help you, een though I see you are one of the 24% of editors who has an article deleted who has more than 350 edits.

I really think this article mimics Template:Retired Pricing Games, and probably should be merged or deleted...

There are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

1. List the page on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)
3. You can request a mentor to help you: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.

If the page you created is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 02:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Rhode Island

Regarding this, are you sure? The exact date is mentioned in the current version of Rhode Island. --BorgQueen (talk) 01:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I did notice it on Rhode Island#Famous firsts in Rhode Island after I made that edit, which is why I put it back on the backup area.[7] And then I noticed this so I did that. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 01:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Pittsburgh Steelers helmet rightface.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Pittsburgh Steelers helmet rightface.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

WP:ERRORS

Could you also fix the DYK error? The easiest fix is to insert an of after history in the third hook. Shubinator (talk) 15:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

[8]. Zzyzx11 (talk) 15:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
[9]. Shubinator (talk) 15:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! On a kind of unrelated note, could you protect the 6 upcoming DYK images at Commons? They're at Template:Did you know/Queue. Shubinator (talk) 15:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

First, I can only do 4 now since Q4 and Q5 need to updated. Second, I am unfamiliar with the DYK Queue policies so I am unsure if I am setting the expiry times right.[10] Template:Did you know/Queue/LocalUpdateTimes seems to have been not updated recently. And yes, I am currently using a terminal where I am only able to protect the commons images directly, not upload them locally to en.wiki. Zzyzx11 (talk) 15:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Yep, the times look fine; a bit close, but with the bot it's usually on the dot. The queues in Next update and Next next update will be moved to 4 and 5, so those images could also be protected. Protecting at Commons is preferred, since there's less load on the servers and the humans. LocalUpdateTimes is a true template that automatically updates itself (take a look at the edit window). Thank you! Shubinator (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I would prefer to wait until they are officially in the queue. Protecting directly on Commons is not my first choice. I have been around long enough to have encountered several users from other wikipedias and other Wikimedia Foundation projects who don't like us doing that and would prefer to be able to edit those images on Commons regardless of what is happening here on en.Wiki. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 16:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Ok, that works. This is the first time I've heard of others preferring temporary uploads. I can see where they're coming from, but it seems a tad selfish on their part. (And in response I'm sure a few would say that we're being selfish.) Ah well. Thank you for all your help. Shubinator (talk) 16:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

economics prize

Hello--thanks for the banner at Talk:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. I hadn't seen that kind of thing before, it should help. CRETOG8(t/c) 13:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:NYJets1978.png)

Thanks for uploading File:NYJets1978.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:New York Jets helmet rightface.png)

Thanks for uploading File:New York Jets helmet rightface.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Fish Slapping Dance.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fish Slapping Dance.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chillum 22:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

As a protest to the constant debates as to what specifically qualifies under WP:NFCC rule #8, I am currently declining to add a fair use description to screenshots such as that one. Zzyzx11 (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:2009StanleyCupFinals.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:2009StanleyCupFinals.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Replaced by File:2009 NHL Stanley Cup Finals Logo.svg. Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

National Hockey League GAR notice

National Hockey League has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/April 4

Hi there. So what exactly are your intentions? why you want to hide some people from the history ???? i have editted correctly and you made it change third time. Nothing is disputed I have given the sources on my articles. "the Zulfikar Ali Bhutto article was hidden back in April because it was, and currently is now, tagged that its the factual accuracy is disputed." the fact is its not and he was died on 4th April. Cheers. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZHJ786 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:San Diego Chargers helmet rightface.png)

Thanks for uploading File:San Diego Chargers helmet rightface.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Removal of icons on the template USCabinet

Hello, I noticed that you have removed the icons from the template USCabinet on 2 March 2009 (changes to template. I noticed that there was no discussion prior to the edit, and also in you edit summary "See WP:ICONDECORATION - don't confuse readers - they want click on links to the articles, not go to the image description pages of those logos" couldn't the logo just been linked to the agencies them selves, thus keeping the logos and giving more info to the user. Please respond quickly to get this over wit ASAP. - Thank's Cocoaguy ここがいいcontribstalk Review Me! 04:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Answered. Please keep further comments there. Zzyzx11 (talk) 05:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

List of Super Bowl champions nominated at WP:FLRC

I have nominated List of Super Bowl champions for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Matthewedwards :  Chat  17:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

SA

Sorry about not knowing the single bite rule. I saw the title that said that article quality was the main concern and started sticking the Vietnam FAs on it YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 06:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

There are several rules listed on WP:OTD besides featuring well-written article, such as writing entries in past tense and "any particular selected article should only be listed (be an emboldened entry) once" on the SA templates. Don't worry, other people have done that also. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
I just happened across Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Southeast Asian military history task force/Popular pages and saw that many GA+ articles were not being read much so I decided to publicise them a bit YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 07:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the additions and suggestions. Unfortunately, I haven't been keeping track of the recent newly promoted GA's. I should though since there is more good articles than at least last year. Much easier to go down January 1 and the other date pages. Zzyzx11 (talk) 07:08, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Featured list

Hi
Feel free to restore it in toto if you find it useful, I'd think that would be non-controversial enough. You have to do something about the displayed list though, without the {{lotd scroll}} it was very useless, and that particular template had some non-free content issues as discussed at WP:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 19#Template:Lotd scroll.
Cheers, Amalthea 20:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

I might just put a note on that talk page instead. Since it was highly dependent on the now deleted {{lotd scroll}}, restoring much of the history might in fact be useless. I assume you saw that discussion on Talk:Main Page#Idea, and I'm concerned others might be curious about the proposal after reading it. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Ah, sorry, I hadn't seen that it was referred to in a current discussion, I would have left it alone if I had. Cheers, Amalthea 21:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Oakland Raiders GAR warning

Oakland Raiders has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Samuel Alito nomination.jpg

File:Samuel Alito nomination.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Bush-Alito-051031.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Bush-Alito-051031.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

I Invite all

To particapate in my Secret Page Challange in the end you might get a cute barnstar so come on down and play today BigPadresDude 00:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, but I am not interested. I should also remind you that the use of secret pages is controversial. For more information, see User:Bahamut0013/Secret pages, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Secret pages and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/MZMcBride. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Hudson's Voyage up the Hudson River

Hi. The cited sentence in Henry Hudson#1608 to 1609 was overly broad. Going back to the only contemporaneous account of the voyage, first mate's Juet's journal http://www.halfmoon.mus.ny.us/Juets-modified.pdf we see that his entry for September 12th states "This morning at our first rode in the Riuer". I have clarified the article and will undo the September 12th deletions. I'll check back here if you want to discuss this further. --Igoldste (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that is what was needed. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 22:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Cool. Thanks. --Igoldste (talk) 22:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

{{Los Angeles County, California}}

Problem with the addition of Big Pines to the county template was that the {{nowrap}} wasn't closed — see my fix. Nyttend (talk) 23:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Lehman anniversary

Please add the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy to the September 15 Anniversary Page again. --bender235 (talk) 12:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Answered on Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/September 15. Zzyzx11 (talk) 14:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Arnhem

I can't imagine you did it just for me Zzyzx11, but thankyou very much for putting the Battle of Arnhem on the main page today. Nice to know people think it's good enough! Ranger Steve (talk) 00:43, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Edit this page

I have nominated Edit this page (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 15:45, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Zulfikar_Ali_Bhutto
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Zzyzx11/Archive22&oldid=1089918103"