Template:Did you know nominations/Between you and I

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Between you and I[edit]

5x expanded by Drmies (talk). Self nominated at 03:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC).

  • We'll call this a 5x expansion, based on my experience converting Budd SPV-2000 from a redirect into an article. On those grounds it's a 289x prose expansion, which I guess we can allow. Expansion occurred in the last two days. The article is well-written and strongly referenced and explains an otherwise arcane but apparently notable grammatical controversy. I did not detect any close paraphrasing issues. Hook is verified and amusing; it would be nice if Garner had indicated who originally made the claim. Once QPQ is done we're good to go. Mackensen (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Mackensen, QPQ is done--thanks for your review and your kind words. Drmies (talk) 01:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Good to go. Mackensen (talk) 01:55, 28 July 2014 (UTC)