Talk:Tuanku Imam Bonjol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

Is Tuanku a royal title? In any case, I am sorting this fellow by the name of the state he helped found.

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 14:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


ISLAMIC HERO INSTEAD OF NASIONAL HERO.

After reading the article, I conclude that Tuanku Imambonjol is more an Islamic hero as opposed to Indonesian national Hero. In the beginning of his involvment in the Padri's movement he was more concerned about Islamic teachings than the sesnse of nationalism. He attacked his fellow countrymen, the Minang Adat community.

Under the attack of the Imanbonjol force, it is only logical and reasonable for the Minang Adat Community to seek for helps. In this situation, the Ducth was more than thankful to lend some helps.

Had Imambonjol let the Kaum Adat (Minang Adat community)live their lives naturally as they have been doing for many thousands of years, the People of Minang did not have to endure the sufferings they were going through during the Padri's War. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.163.80.185 (talkcontribs)

Nonetheless, he is one of those rewarded with the title National Hero of Indonesia. Rigadoun (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He is considered a national hero simply because he fought the Dutch, the despised colonialists. (Caniago 00:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]

He's an Islamis hero, not Indonesian, Indonesia didn't excist at that time, It was a war where the Dutch were asked to intervene against Sharia law by muslim fundamentalists.ArmTheInsane (talk) 15:27, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tuanku Imam Bonjol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]