Talk:The Merger (The Office)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Merger (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Merger (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 14, 2012Good article nomineeListed
January 5, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Random 6th employee?[edit]

I have a question. In the scene where Gardner quits, and Dwight asks Michael what suggestions Andy has given him... it pans over to Andy sitting on the table and there's a shot of an employee next to him that isn't named and is not seen at all though out the episode. When all the workers file out of the conference room, this random guy is not with them. Who is he?? anonymous 16:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.110.230.129 (talk) [reply]

My fiance and I were watching and she noticed the man also. We paused and recognized him as Martin Freeman, aka Tim Canterbury, Jim's counterpart from the UK version of the Office. However we couldn't find him in the credits, or proof anywhere. Can anyone else verify this? --Mikeycomicsinc (talk) 03:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dunder Mifflin[edit]

I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 16:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TheMerger.jpg[edit]

Image:TheMerger.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Merger (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 00:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lede: I would add characters first names in the intro
  • Lede: Any noteworthy production info that could go in this section?
  • Plot: "(throughout the episode they interact in a friendly but awkward manner)" This is kind of fancrufty and not really needed..
  • Plot: "No. 2" and "number two" are both used. I'd pick one
  • Plot: The section about Karen and Phyllis last only, like, 30 seconds in the episode, why is it a third of the plot summary?
  • Plot: Maybe use "overweight" instead of "hefty"
  • Reception: You mention the Staples product placement. Is this the episode where Kevin plays with the Staples shredder, and the scenes were then cut from re-broadcast? If so, maybe you should add that in somewhere, maybe in production.
  • References: On Ref. 10, there is a double period

That's really all I can find. Although the image is just two people, it is an important scene in the context of the series, so I think it's justified. One hold.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've made most of the changes, but am still looking for info on the Staples commercial (busy traveling currently, so this may take a little more time). I'll post here once I've added something. Thanks for reviewing! Ruby 2010/2013 03:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I'll keep it on hold until you can find what you need. :)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:06, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I've added info on Kevin's Staples scene. Website Magazine might look questionable, but the article was posted by Peter A. Prestipino, the site's editor-in-chief. I believe it is thus a RS due to its editorial staff. Also, it is only one of three references I am using to cite the sentence (so the onus of verification is not being placed solely on it). Thanks again for the review. Ruby 2010/2013 21:43, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Merger (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Merger (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]