Talk:Synod of Mâcon

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's souls[edit]

Untitled[edit]

How exactly that discussion is a "myth" if the very source quoted claims that a council, most likely one of these synods, included a discussion on this subject started by one of attending bishops? --KiloByte (talk) 02:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the 'myth' is that the subject of the discussion was not the soul of the women but the meaning in Latin of 'homo'. The bishops replied to their colleague that in Latin 'homo' means both man and woman (human being, person) otherwise we should find 'vir' that means only man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.150.152.68 (talk) 12:14, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]