Talk:Next Generation 9-1-1

RFC NG9-1-1

Please provide comments and suggestions on this article. NextGen911 (talk) 14:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for starting this page on Next Generation 9-1-1! I've removed links to [Next Generation 9-1-1.org] from the article as a potential Conflict of Interest. Thanks again for your contribution. Jc3 (talk) 06:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! I see you did some editing - I'll take a look at it later. Not sure what you saw as a COI issue here, but I don't see how I can contact you - you have no user page. I have a wiki mentor now, so I can ask him. Or maybe you'll watch this page? At any rate, thanks - and do reply if you see this, as I'm trying to learn. NextGen911 (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello - The multiple links to "Next Generation 9-1-1.org" (a commercial site for products and services for NG9-1-1) are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Also, it could be inferred that you're directly connected to this enterprise, which would also be a COI. As described on the COI page, you're urged to: "...exercise great caution when: Editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with..." Jc3 (talk) 01:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for replying! No, I'm not connected to that website. I did see they had a products page, but didn't think that would be a problem, since the NENA site did too. I did like the diagram they had there (the DOT ones were too complicated for laymen), and the way they described things in layman's terms, but I think I can find other refs to replace those if that would be best. I want to do more work on this article, and you seem to know something about the subject - will you help further? I'd like to discuss one of your edits - see the new talk section below called "NENA and DOT contributions". And thanks again! NextGen911 (talk) 02:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for jumping to conclusions, the site just seemed odd to include (not highly ranked in searched, etc.) I look forward to helping improve the article. Jc3 (talk) 22:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

NENA and DOT contributions

Jc3: The NENA page referenced does state "NENA identified this need in 2000, published the Future Path Plan in 2001, and began development activities toward this end in 2003". But if you look at the Future Path Plan itself there is no reference to "Next Generation" at all, and many of the methods of reporting an emergency that were later identified in the DOT initiative weren't mentioned either. NENA participated in the DOT initiative. Looking at the documents, it appears that NENA merged its earlier FPP project into this initiative, and then started referring to it as "Next Generation 9-1-1". If that's true, then shouldn't we somehow reflect that sequence of events? (Interesting note: the FPP was on the very page you referenced when I looked this morning - now it's moved to http://www.nena.org/media/File/ESFutureDesign.pdf. And they have a whole new set of docs on that page now. Things are moving fast). NextGen911 (talk) 02:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

I'll look for a better source to reference Jc3 (talk) 22:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Introduction

Looks good overall. I'd suggest though that the first sentence's use of the word "nation's" should be changed to reflect what nation you're talking about. It's not until the last section of the intro that we're told that this is concerning the United States. 173.22.123.35 (talk) 05:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Will do, thanks. I'm also going to post a todo section here when I get a chance; there are several things that I think would help, including using a cite template for the refs. NextGen911 (talk) 18:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Todo list for this article

Please feel free to add to this list, and to do any of the suggested edits! NextGen911 (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

• Edit article intro as suggested above to identify NG 9-1-1 as a U.S. project
• Proof read carefully and correct grammmar, usage, and clumbsy phrasing
• Use cite template for all references
• Add info about 2008 U.S. law that mandated implementation of an NG 9-1-1 system (NET 911 Improvement Act of 2008) NextGen911 (talk) 17:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Did this one. Dashunderscore (talk) 16:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• DOT and NENA refs are necessary, as they define the initiative. However, these are "primary sources". Find additional independent sources about the initiative.
• Add information about current status of 'early adopter' efforts (e.g. State of Vermont http://e911.vermont.gov/sites/e911/files/pdf/E911-NG911.pdf and Indiana Wireless Board https://www.in911.net/documents/Indiana_Statewide911_Plan_Final.pdf [Page 22])
• Add information about the technology and standards being deployed (e.g. SIP, LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ecrit/), etc.) Jc3 (talk) 22:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Next Generation 9-1-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080916084357/http://www.its.dot.gov/ng911/next_gen_911_sys.htm to http://www.its.dot.gov/ng911/next_gen_911_sys.htm#need

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Next Generation 9-1-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111106042758/http://www.tiaonline.org/standards/ to http://www.tiaonline.org/standards/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)