Talk:Marlboro Music School and Festival

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Vermont stub]] on the article page.

If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject United States|class=stub|importance=|VT=yes|VT-importance=}} above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.

2009 article in The New Yorker about the Marlboro festival[edit]

Here is a reference that might be used to expand our own article on this topic:

Alex Ross (2009-06-29). ""The music mountain"". The New Yorker: p. 56-65. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help) (registration required).

Ross gives the history of the festival and tells about the Vienna connection. EdJohnston (talk) 15:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

possible disagreement about founders[edit]

[The English translation of] the French Wikipedia article Andr%C3%A9_Aisenstadt [the one I used was "courtesy of" Google Translate] gives a different list of the founders. Actually, it calls the school "la célèbre école de musique Malboro", which translates to [something like] "the renowned Marlboro Music School" -- which seems to omit mentioning any "festival".

I understand that this might be mainly some issue of misunderstanding, or mis-translation, rather than a (more substantive) disagreement about who really did the founding. I am not certain that any change is needed to (the English version of) this article. Maybe some digging in to the sources -- [which I don't have time for, right now!] -- would shed some light on what really happened, and the source (and the nature) of that "apparent" bit of ostensible disagreement, and it might lead to some ideas for what to do next -- including, perhaps, yielding [some suggestions for] some improvements to the above mentioned "fr.wikipedia.org" article about Dr. André Aisenstadt (The English Wikipedia currently gives a red link for "André Aisenstadt".... :-) HTH, --Mike Schwartz (talk) 19:27, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]