Talk:Kurnool/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Promotional statement

Removed this statement → Good to live. People respect each other. Good and affordable health care and well equipped hospitals. Cost of living is affordable. Currently cinemas are the only form of entertainment. Theaters, play houses and nightclubs are not yet the part of the landscape. Healthy mix of different sections of society and regions in India. A place famous for doctors in around rayalaseema. Treatment is available for every disease.

Reason= non encyclopedic. --Jisha (Talk) 17:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Reverting

I restored the infobox and lead. I should have said 9 October (not 2 October) in my edit summary on the problem edit cutting out material. Charles Matthews 10:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

File:Kondareddy buruju.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Kondareddy buruju.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Relegion

The section on relegion looks like it is about one famous church. I think this should be moved to another article about that church. Any objections please respond. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishnadevaraya (talk • contribs) 16:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Would request you to kindly improve your vocabulary and spelling and get back to Wikipedia. Since you have asked for objections, I support your cause and object. Would be looking forward to you with a better improvement. God bless. Shroffameen (talk) 19:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Removed Reference Test Section

Deleted the Reference Test Section. It was not necessary as the reference used in it is already included in References. For any queries, you can discuss it on my talk page. Aminuddinshroff (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kurnool/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==Quality assessment== This article has been rated as a start class article. The biggest problem with this article is that its list-heavy, and tone is very informal with "..and the list goes on..." types of sentences. If the lists are converted to usable prose, with little more commentary, it would be great. It has been rated as mid-importance because of the historical significance of the city. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Last edited at 17:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 21:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Addition of language

Urdu is spoken by 1/4th of the total population of kurnool .So my request is to include Urdu in the official languages of kurnool city. Kasish Shah (talk) 19:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

It should be an official language of the state.--Vin09 (talk) 08:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kurnool. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)