Talk:Ki Longfellow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Crown cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Crown cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Eio Magdalene Cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Eio Magdalene Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Spanish cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Spanish cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Best known as...[edit]

With all due respect to Longfellow's own work, I think it would be more true to say that she is best known as the widow of Vivian Stanshall and guardian of his artistic heritage. What do others think?? Rodparkes (talk) 18:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that in England she is best known as Vivian Stanshall's widow, but in the US where Vivian is not very well known (a crime), she is best known for her own work. So you are right and wrong at the same time. So what about saying this: ...best known as the widow of Vivian Stanshall and for blah blah blah? Getitrighty (talk) 20:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a fan of Longfellow's latest book, I only found out about Vivian Stanshall by researching this article. I'd never heard of him. So, to me, she was and is known for her writing. But reading about Vivian on his own page I can see that fans of Vivian might only know her as his widow. Most of these are English, right? I agree with Getitrighty. Try to work in both. I'll do that now.Shanalk (talk) 16:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once a Thief[edit]

The IMDB entry for Once a Thief doesn't mention Longfellow. Any RS for this claim? -- Hoary (talk) 06:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with tone and sources[edit]

There is too much reliance on interviews with Longfellow, with little third-party Reliable Sources. Haven't any of her books been reviewed by newspapers or magazines? The article has had the tone of fan magazines, and way too much unsourced material about her early life. It should not read like an essay. Have edited it to try to tone it down and stick to facts. Needs better sources, not her or publishers.Parkwells (talk) 17:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with sources[edit]

The sources cited cannot be verified: undated article on Toronto.com can't be found online, even by article number; no transcripts online of radio interview; no date for interview in Bristolian, etc. Essentially this means the article is unsourced, other than being able to verify publication of books through publishers' websites. If this can't be corrected, all these cites will be removed.Parkwells (talk) 14:54, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ki Longfellow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Ki Longfellow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ki_Longfellow&oldid=1208574661"