User talk:Shanalk

AfD nomination of Ki Longfellow

I've nominated Ki Longfellow, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Ki Longfellow satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ki Longfellow and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Ki Longfellow during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.RJASE1 ^Talk 04:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't understand. I thought articles on writers were welcome on wikipedia. I read the criteria, but still don't grasp what the problem is. Shanalk 20:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I forgot to add that before I worked on this article, I checked out a number of other writer's entries. Some of them were mere snippets and no comment from wiki added. Some were long pieces describing alchohol abuse, etc. Many of them were for writers I've never heard of. A few were for writers I could not find by googling, yet if you google Longfellow it goes on for almost 20 google pages. What is the criteria for inclusion? Perhaps I haven't added enough references. (Many of the articles I read had none.) I can add more if that is the problem. Shanalk 20:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Crown cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Crown cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Copyrighted picture without Fair use rationale

Dear Shanalk

I take the liberty to asnwer the question you posted on user Betacommands talk page, and beware this reply is not endorsed by Betacommand, or anybody else, it is my sole opinion.

To comply with the law a copyrighted image must have both tag saying it is a non-free image AND a text exsplaneing the fair use rationale, as in why there is a fair use, and in what articles it may be used.

The bot BetacommandBot tags images and notify uploaders of pictures with a non-free tag but without a fair use rationale-

A bot does not have the ability to delete images from wikipedia, only an administrator does. The tags mean that your images wil go through a review by an administrator to see if there is Fair use explantion on the page.
It is not enough that there is a tag saying this image qualifies for fair use, there must also be an explantion for fair use.
This means you need to go the page and add a fair use rationale to the picture. Please do not remove the notice posted by the bot, the reviewing admin will do it.
Please see this picture Image:BizarreRideIIthePharcyde.jpg for an album cover with proper fair use rationale. or see Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline. You can besides the fair use rationale also add the following text.

This images was uploaded by Shanalk (Talk), for questions about this image please go to my talk page.

I hope this answers your question,

Best regards and happy edinting. Mads Angelbo ^{Talk / Contribs} 18:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Eio Magdalene Cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eio Magdalene Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Spanish cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Spanish cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Nancy Savoca+sm.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Nancy Savoca+sm.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 18:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Stink28.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Shanalk!
We thank you for uploading Image:Stink28.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot.

--John Bot III (talk) 18:07, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Crown magdalene.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Crown magdalene.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stinkfoot, a Comic Opera

I have nominated Stinkfoot, a Comic Opera, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stinkfoot, a Comic Opera. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ling.Nut.Public (talk) 00:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

May 2010

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop adding the same external link to multiple articles. Wikipedia is not a what's on guide. Simple Bob (talk) 06:27, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Crown cover.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crown cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 22:55, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)