Talk:Johan Norberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why is there a mention that johan has two kids if their names are not included[edit]

I don't see how this section meets WP:NOTE-- after all, for all we know his children are motherless! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mac Henni (talk • contribs) 00:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Todo[edit]

todo: http://www.johannorberg.net/?page=globisgood

I've mentioned it. Does it need any more? Tamino 10:48, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchist[edit]

he mentions being an anarchist in defence for global capitalism, however he supports globalisation, would this make him a highly criticised "anarcho-capitalist"

I think he says that he was a anarchist in his youth, but left it later. Carl Logan 08:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism/Anarcho-capitalism/Alleged anachism/etc.[edit]

I've seen a few edits of this article dealing with Norberg's early political activities including his involvement in the "Anarchist Front" party that he claims that he and his friends formed while at the senior level of compulsory school. He claims himself in his biography the following:

"Otherwise my political involvement started with a number of friends and myself winning the school election at the senior level of compulsory school, with a party of our own, the Anarchist Front. I abandoned my anti-industrial anarchism, however, a few years later, for three reasons. Firstly, I was unable to romanticise the period preceding industrialisation and large-scale enterprise after reading history had taught me that it was not a pastoral idyll but a time of starvation, disease and premature death. Secondly, I came to realise that not only too much policing, but also too little, can lead to oppression and injustice. Thirdly, my reading of the classics of anarchism told me that they did not stand for liberty. Oh yes, everyone was to be free, but only as long as they lived in small, stifling collectives and shared everything equally. Then I discovered liberalism, which took freedom seriously."

I do not believe that this statement can be read in any other way than that Norberg was at the time an anarachist, not an "alleged anarachist" or an anarcho-capitalist, but an anarchist. If you have any verifiable source as to Norberg holding any other views at this time than anarchist, please provide such a source. If you do not, edits of that kind will be reverted. If you do not agree with my interpretation of Norberg's quote above, state your reasons on this page and let's have a discussion to settle the matter rather than edit back and forth. Sarnalios 00:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal Vs. Libertarian[edit]

In U.S. English the adjective "libertarian" would more accurately describe Johan Norberg than liberal, even if he would describe himself as liberal. He is liberal in the classic sense of the word, or in the sense of how the word is used in the rest of the English speaking world. Use of the word liberal is misleading to most U.S. readers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.75.46.71 (talk) 17:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is international. If we used libertarian then Europeans AND Australians would get confused and there is more Aussies and Europeans than americans, so you just have to get used to it. Would you also like to change all measurements to imperialist to fit your needs? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.236.128.225 (talk) 13:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well. I would like that messaurements is mentioned FIRST in the system it was originated and then in parenthesis the metric/imperial (Americans must accept that their mesaurements are originally imperial even if somewhat modified) or when original is neither both in parenthesis. REASON: quite often the metric form is misleading. Example Railway gauges was originally mostly imperial and later changed to metric, gun caliber also. Whitout knowing that russian gauge was originally 5 feet (American) later mentioned as 1524 mm, later (by narrowing ply) changed to 1520 mm. Swidish narrowgauge was usually given as 891 mm but was 3 Swedish feet. The same is valid for gun calibers and a few othe cases. I personally think that Mt Everest should be set as 29029 feet or 8848 m, the height waries a few inches up or down over seasons and different snowfall but is always around that. This is all about American vs the rest of the world, I agree that we sometimes have to adjust to American but they are almost the only country that still tries to tell the rest of the world how to do things in launguages and metricsSeniorsag (talk) 15:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article nominated for deletion[edit]

Non-notable person. This is essentially a vanity bio created either by the subject himself or by like-minded fans of his think-tank work. Fails the criteria detailed in WP:Prof as the "honors" awarded to the subject were handed out simply by his think-tank colleagues and/or employers and publisher, NOT by independent academics or authorities. J.R. Hercules (talk) 04:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree: Johan Norberg is clearly a notable person under WP:Bio. While much of his work has an academic style to it, he is not strictly an academic, but an author and contributer to the international debate on economic globalization. Sarnalios (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion should not be taken here. The article was nominated for deletion here, where the result was speedy keep. /Slarre (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So he's notable enough for you to want him not to be on wikipedia and for people to argue that his page should be kept, but not notable enough for the world to know that he exists? You contradict yourself.

Also, what are "independant academics or authorities"? Everyone has an opinion. 129.215.149.98 (talk) 17:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The thing that bothers me about this page is that its very existence gives this guy some credibility that he doesn’t seem to deserve. For example, he is quoted in other articles such as Shock Doctrine and Milton Friedman, yet as far as I can find out, there is no reason to value his opinion over any man off the street.

Just belonging to the Cato Institute does not give you instant credibility.

Bigger jake (talk) 12:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He is notable in the same way that, say, Naomi Klein is notable. I assume you'll write a similar comment on that talk page? Janm67 (talk) 17:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently Johan Norberg always upsets the socialist establishment, that alone makes him valuable enough to have a Wikipedia entry. --200.74.67.242 (talk) 18:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2017 edits[edit]

Added " Allt om Naomi Kleins nakenchock" a small book in Swedish about Naomi Kleins The shock doctrine (Swedish edition) which managed to step om a few toes. (Also corrected a few small errors in the other book definitions.)Seniorsag (talk) 14:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johan Norberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient photo[edit]

I guess it's nice to know what Norberg looked like a decade ago, but I think the article would be better if there was a recent photo so that readers could recognize him. For example, here's an article from last year which has a photo taken by his wife: I bet she'd be willing to allow it to be used. https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article159292395/Uns-ging-es-noch-nie-so-gut-wie-heute.html

Thing is, I don't know what to do next. Can someone who's done this before follow up on it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.161.108 (talk) 03:30, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johan Norberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Historian of ideas"?[edit]

Norberg should not be refered to as such, usually the title of historian is reserved for people with doctoral degrees in their subject, or having contributed significantly to the academic discipline otherwise. Norberg only has a masters, and does not fulfill the other criterion either. 94.255.240.79 (talk) 19:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Johan_Norberg&oldid=1205535043"