User talk:Janm67

Edgar F. Codd

thanks for your contributions to the EFCodd article. I don't mean to berate, but to praise, beacuse I think the change was a good one. I marked it as {{fact}} because I think that you would be the best person to find ths source for such a comment. I think the EFCodd article can be a featured article soon, and we need more sources cited for that. Thanks for your help, and welcome to wikipedia! McKay 03:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

w00t!! Thanks. McKay 18:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Carl Hewitt

Hi! During the recent AfD discussion about the article Carl Hewitt you expressed some concerns about the article, and suggested that it needed to be rewritten. I have undertaken a substantial rewrite of the article in an attempt to address the concerns raised by you and other editors, and would appreciate it if you could look over the current state of the article to see if you have any suggestions for further improvement. Thanks. --Allan McInnes (talk) 14:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Looks good to me, thanks! Janm67 15:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! --Allan McInnes (talk) 06:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Avrim Blum

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Avrim Blum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Avrim Blum. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jeanne Ferrante

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jeanne Ferrante, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nick Garvey (talk) 06:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Anant Agarwal

I have nominated Anant Agarwal, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anant Agarwal. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. RMHED (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Potential DYK

Great article stub at Giles Brindley - I think if you could expand it a little the erectile dysfunction demonstration would make a great hook for a WP:DYK! Gonzonoir (talk) 11:49, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion

I am contacting Ban Ki Moon too. He hasn't been on the job as long as the others, but this matter requires all hands on deck. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Battle for Saarbrücken

You added information from the after the Battle magazine about the Battle of Saarbrücken, also about Wolf-Günther_Trierenberg. Thank you very much for this much needed information.

However, I'm not sure it is complete. In January 1945, this map shows the 347th in Saarbrücken. According to [1], The 347. Infantrie-Division was part of the 1st Army, LXXXV Coprs in February 1945, stationed in the Saarpfalz area. A map of operation undertone shows that Saarbrücken was indeed defended by the LXXXV Corps in March 1945. However, the 559. Volks-Grenadier-Division was also in the area of Saarbrücken as part of the XIII SS Corps in February 1945. It seems very likely that they took part in the engagements. From a discussion in a german forum, I get it that the 347th was stationed a bit to the west of Saarbrücken, in the area of Bous (Buß, Buss) - Grande-Rossele (Großrosseln) in March 1945, fell back to the area of Völklingen - Püttlingen March 18th and fully left the area in the night from March the 19th to March the 20th. Those areas are slightly to the west of Saarbrücken, and the Grande-Rossele is actually on the western flank of the battle for Saarbrücken, where a lot of the fighting took place.

Can you check your source again for information about the center Spichern-Stellung or the eastern flank (Spicheren, Giffertswald)? The source is sadly not available online.--Micge (talk) 13:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Janm67. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Janm67. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Janm67. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)