Talk:GCE Ordinary Level

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Grading[edit]

I think this article is wrong about O Level grades - from inception until 1975 an O Level was just pass/fail. Exam boards would give students grades, but these were informal and did not appear on the GCE certificate. In 1975, for the first time, the A-E grading system was brought in, with grade C being equivalent to an old pass. Evidence: Commons Hansard 2 August 1976 James Groves (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that my O-level certificate includes grades on the 1-6 system. And it was awarded before 1975. Bluewave (talk) 20:55, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - I too think this article is misleading. I took O Levels in 1975 when all grades below C were "fail" grades. You would not, for instance, claim a D or E as a "pass" on a CV when applying for a job and you would not be allowed to follow at A level any subject you got a D or below grade in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.206.230.82 (talk) 10:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article is wrong about grades but I cannot agree with James Groves. The grades did not appear on the certificate and may not have been reported publicly but that does not mean they didn't exist. I took O levels in 1970, 1971 and 1972. I haven't got my certificates in front of me but I am pretty sure University of London was the examining board. The pass grades in those years were A, C and E with F being a failure. I don't think there was anything below an F. I still have the result slips with these grades on at home if anyone wants proof. Prh47bridge (talk) 15:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not for the unfamiliar[edit]

For those of us who live outside the UK, this article doesn't make much sense or explain anything. What is the exam for? What kind of students take it and in what grades/years? How is it scored? BrotherSulayman (talk) 07:51, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. The article's too thin and vague. It says they were exam-based. Exam based what, exactly? Exam-based exams? What were they? Why did a person have to do them? What exactly did a person do at the O-level and what were the advantages of doing/not doing it? If you're not British, its incomprehensible from just reading the article. It sounds like they might be garde-based college-entrance exams (or based on them? or practice for them?) but it also looks like that's the A-levels job. Was it required to sit for these before attending next-stage higher learning for a particular age group? Are they exam-based lecture prep? Are they actual written exams? Oral?, etc. Tangverse (talk) 13:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
10 years later still the same problem. I came here today to say exactly the same :-(
Why make/ have an article if not willing to EXPLAIN anything? 2A02:3034:13:D3A2:1:1:F08E:A5F7 (talk) 13:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Description of critic Madsen Pirie[edit]

Someone has written "sociological researcher Madsen Pirie", this is clearly incorrect. If the author of such a mistake put his name through a search engine they would find that he is more of an economist (http://www.adamsmith.org/about-us/key-people). He was also Distinguished Professor of Philosophy and Logic at Hillsdale College in Michigan. Whilst an intellectual clearly, he is not a sociologist. (ElizabethFry42 (talk) 22:10, 25 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]

To suggest that a reversion to O -levels is a waste of time seems a bit political and not unbiased.82.132.238.244 (talk) 10:40, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moving content[edit]

The article at present is quite UK-centric. However the O-level qualification is still awarded today in several countries including Singapore and Mauritius, which may be based on or have their similarities to the UK O level but which also maintain their clear distinctions and unique properties. They merit mention in the main article and perhaps the UK-specific details can be moved to a UK O level article. This models what has been done in the process of cleaning up the GCE Advanced Level article. --Shruti14 talksign 11:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GCE Ordinary Level. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

physics[edit]

What motion Ben Pol AKA (talk) 18:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

mathematics[edit]

Making x the subject of a number? Ben Pol AKA (talk) 18:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Ben Pol AKA (talk) 18:48, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But what is it?[edit]

I read the intro blurb and still have no idea what it is or how this differs from other education systems. And there's no simple English version either. Article seems like it's written for people who already understand it.--2604:2D80:DE11:1300:4DE5:35B5:5DD3:86B4 (talk) 20:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As did the people who commented under the heading "Not for the unfamiliar" in 2023 (!), I have the same problem as you, and need to say: This text's "explanations" are un-understandable/ incomprehensible for people from outside those countries. 2A02:3034:13:D3A2:1:1:F08E:A5F7 (talk) 13:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kenya uses it too[edit]

https://staustins.ac.ke/everything-you-need-to-know-about-o-levels/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E5:EF21:DD01:3DA7:9736:192B:ABDE (talk) 18:57, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]