Talk:Beirut Knights

	Lebanon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Novels

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Beirut may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Note to CSD reviewing admin[edit]

I cut out a copyvio in the first section. The author replaced it and I removed it again. I then checked the article more closely and found the second section was just one long quote. If I removed it as well there would be noting of substance. Jbh (talk) 14:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note to CSD reviewing admin[edit]

I think I sorted out the issue with the content now. This is the first time I use wikipedia, so I thought that using quote marks and very clear references would mean there are no issues. I thought I had resolved the issue with the first quote by having better citation. I guess not! Anyway, User:Jbhunley was kind enough to sort that out by deleting the quote in question. User: Jbhunley also noticed that there's an issue with the other quote (which I again didn't know was an issue since when I wrote it I thought quoting was fine if there was citation). I paraphrased the second section now though (and obviously kept the reference). I think the article should be fine now as there are no more copyright issues and there is content. This has been a valuable learning experience: I now know that you can't quote (even if you reference)! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazz1479 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the db-copyright tag I placed. You can use small direct, cited, quotes on Wikipedia just not big blocks of text. Give our WP:COPYVIO and WP:COPYRIGHT pages for our policies Jbh (talk) 17:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the important lesson User:Jbhunley! I'm definitely going to read those two pages thoroughly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.105.80.1 (talk) 18:19, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beirut Knights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402120237/http://www.executive-magazine.com/society/stop-single-shaming to http://www.executive-magazine.com/society/stop-single-shaming

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]