[Wikipedia-l] anglicization is indeed stupid

Wed Nov 20 21:20:35 UTC 2002

> When you try to translate everything the very real
> risk is that you end 
> up using a form that nobody recognizes.  If a name
> is not widely known, 
> we should be favouring the original language form,
> with standard 
> transliterations when that is applicable.  With
> novels and movies we 
> should be favouring the original language title;
> there is no way that we 
> should be attempting the translation of titles that
> have never been 
> produced in English translations.  Whether the title
> of Camus's novel 
> "L'Ã‰tranger" should be the literal "The Stranger"
> or the metaphorical 
> "The Outsider" is a matter of literary debate that
> is well beyond the 
> scope of this encyclopaedia.  Using the original
> title for the main 
> entry avoids that problem completely.

So the title that what decided was [[The Stranger]] in
the end.

Please, let me rephrase your comment then

"The Outsider" is a matter of literary debate that is
well beyond the scope of this encyclopaedia.  Using
the original title for the main entry *could avoid
that problem completely, if it were the option
chosen*.

There are some evenings, I feel very very very tired.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com