This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Freedom of speech Low‑importance

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed Changes

Untitled[edit]

After reviewing this article thoroughly, I have found several content gaps that I have filled in. I moved some information in the Lead section to go into new sections that I made for better organization and structure. With that being said, I made a new section called "Background" (to show what led the author to write the book), "Publication" (the different editions and versions of the book), "Plot Summary" (what the book is about), "Genre and Style"(why the author styled the book in a certain way), and "Reception" (how society negatively and positively view the book). Within each newly added section, I added essential information for the viewers. For those that wish to see the bibliography, it is currently published on my sandbox. DooinP (talk) 12:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section required some significant rewording due to sources not supporting statements made within as originally written..[edit]

The sources used to support the criticisms levied against the book did not supporting the wording which implied that many or mos libraries self-banned the book or called it "child porn" not the idea that most parents or parents in general have wanted the book banned or disliked the book. What they do support is the among the parents who are critics of the book there a several reason given to justify the wanted bans. Whether most parents share that view or whether a majority of parents even have heard of the book is not answered by the sources listed. So the best we can say is that a significant number of parents have challenged the book and many libraries have removed it or refused to carry it from the get-go but not that either of these numbers represents most or even a majority of libraries (at least in the U.S.). As for it's reception internationally, that seems to be completely missing from the article so that either should be added or the article needs to be clearer that this criticisms/reception reflect mentioned are an American POV and may not reflect the view of other countries. --Notcharliechaplin (talk) 02:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2020 and 6 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DooinP.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]