Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Reference library/Top video games lists

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconVideo games Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

GameTrailers[edit]

GameTrailers.com has a bunch here. I don't have good bandwidth, so I haven't watched them. SharkD  Talk  01:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-pages[edit]

Hopefully the sub-pages get moved soon. The search feature will not work until they are. SharkD  Talk  02:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there should really be a publisher column too if we're going to make it easy to make citations. SharkD  Talk  17:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If we make citations for all entries, should we just have a copy-pastable citation pre-filled including all the common details there - exact date, issue, authors, publisher? In fact, I would say date and year could be merged for that reason. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 18:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that was kind of my idea. As for the date column, that is there because I wanted the table to be sortable. Some entries only have an issue number, and the issue information is going to mess up the sorting if it's in the same column. I guess we could could get rid of the year column, but I want to be able to sort by date. SharkD  Talk  23:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Are there really any entries with unknown publication date? Sorting by date is definitely useful, and I assumed all entries would be able to provide a date, if applicable. Or are we talking dynamic lists that get continuously updated? In those cases, would a date even matter? —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 17:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, some lists don't have dates because new titles get added sparodically. SharkD  Talk  17:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I moved all the dates to the Date column and added the Publisher and Archive URL columns. SharkD  Talk  17:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please put each list in its own sub-page. Thanks. SharkD  Talk  23:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Almost two dozen user-based lists didn't seem that important to subpage each. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 23:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Problem is, the search feature doesn't work as intended when you bunch them up into one page. SharkD  Talk  01:31, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

pwnRank[edit]

I found this site which seems to serve the same purpose as this list. Some differences include no platform/genre-specific lists, and the oldest list is from 2008. SharkD  Talk  01:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Sinclair lists to add[edit]

See Your_Sinclair#Official_Top_100_games. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 19:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have access to all 100? SharkD  Talk  20:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
They're online [1]. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 20:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Break[edit]

  • sorry im new here. I was told to come here. I don't believe collapsible list should be in the right boxes of video games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.89.0.47 (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • No this is not the right place. Who told you that? SharkD  Talk  01:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]