Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chess/Assessment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconChess Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Chess
Shortcut: WP:CHESS
Navigation Menu
Project Page talk
talk
Assessment statistics talk
Review talk
Chess Portal talk

Assessment chart/diagram update[edit]

How does the assessment info get updated? Is there some tool or thing to run to get it updated? ChessCreator (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Track of numbers[edit]

Seems the number of chess articles is growing fast recently. Something like 200 within the last two month. According to a note in WP:CHESS on Friday 5 October 2007, the WikiProject Chess reached 2,000 articles. Keeping a record here as might be interesting to look back at in the future.

Chess articles 	Importance
 	Top 	High 	Mid 	Low 	Total
Quality
FA 	1 	1 			2
A 			1 		1
GA 	1 		1 	1 	3
B 	23 	29 	46 	30 	128
Start 	21 	129 	380 	528 	1058
Stub 	2 	56 	250 	872 	1180
Assessed48 	215 	678 	1431 	2372
Total 	48 	215 	678 	1431 	2372

ChessCreator (talk) 12:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update below:14 March 2008. 48 new articles in last 7 days.

Chess articles 	Importance
 	Top 	High 	Mid 	Low 	Total
Quality
FA 	1 	1 			2
A 			1 		1
GA 			1 	1 	2
B 	24 	29 	46 	30 	129
Start 	20 	130 	382 	533 	1065
Stub 	2 	56 	253 	910 	1221
Assessed47 	216 	683 	1474 	2420
Total 	47 	216 	683 	1474 	2420

ChessCreator (talk) 11:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update below:23 March 2008. 27 new articles in last 9 days.

Chess articles 	Importance
 	Top 	High 	Mid 	Low 	Total
Quality
FA 	1 	1 			2
A 			1 		1
GA 			1 	1 	2
B 	24 	31 	46 	30 	131
Start 	20 	129 	384 	536 	1069
Stub 	2 	55 	253 	932 	1242
Assessed47 	216 	685 	1499 	2447
Total 	47 	216 	685 	1499 	2447

Update below:2 April 2008. 6 new articles in last 10 days.

Chess articles 	Importance
 	Top 	High 	Mid 	Low 	Total
Quality
FA 	1 	1 			2
A 			1 		1
GA 			1 	1 	2
B 	25 	31 	47 	25 	128
Start 	21 	129 	385 	536 	1071
Stub 		47 	260 	942 	1249
Assessed47 	208 	694 	1504 	2453
Total 	47 	208 	694 	1504 	2453

ChessCreator (talk) 11:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update below:7 April 2008. 13 new articles in last 5 days.

Chess articles 	Importance
 	Top 	High 	Mid 	Low 	Total
Quality
FA 	1 	1 			2
A 			1 		1
GA 			1 	1 	2
B 	25 	31 	48 	25 	129
Start 	21 	125 	393 	538 	1077
Stub 		43 	266 	946 	1255
Assessed47 	200 	709 	1510 	2466
Total 	47 	200 	709 	1510 	2466

ChessCreator (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update below:18 April 2008. 40 new articles in last 11 days.

Chess articles 	Importance
 	Top 	High 	Mid 	Low 	None 	Total
Quality
FA 	1 	1 				2
A 			1 			1
GA 			1 	1 		2
B 	26 	30 	44 	26 		126
Start 	20 	124 	385 	539 	1 	1069
Stub 		44 	266 	969 	1 	1280
List 		4 	9 	13 		26
Assessed47 	203 	706 	1548 	2 	2506
Total 	47 	203 	706 	1548 	2 	2506

SunCreator (talk) 00:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update below:20 April 2008. 12 new articles in 2 days.

Chess articles 	Importance
 	Top 	High 	Mid 	Low 	Total
Quality
FA 	1 	1 			2
A 			1 		1
GA 			1 	1 	2
B 	27 	33 	46 	26 	132
Start 	19 	119 	386 	540 	1064
Stub 		43 	267 	981 	1291
List 	1 	3 	8 	14 	26
Assessed48 	199 	709 	1562 	2518
Total 	48 	199 	709 	1562 	2518

SunCreator (talk) 01:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update below:23 April 2008. 9 new articles and many re-assessments.

Chess articles 	Importance
 	Top 	High 	Mid 	Low 	Total
Quality
FA 	1 	1 			2
A 			1 		1
GA 			1 	1 	2
B 	42 	59 	57 	14 	172
Start 	3 	111 	429 	551 	1094
Stub 		25 	214 	991 	1230
List 	1 	3 	8 	14 	26
Assessed47 	199 	710 	1571 	2527
Total 	47 	199 	710 	1571 	2527

SunCreator (talk) 00:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC) Update below:4 May 2008. 14 new articles and many re-assessments.[reply]

Chess articles 	Importance
 	Top 	High 	Mid 	Low 	Total
Quality
FA 	1 	1 			2
A 			2 		2
GA 			1 	1 	2
B 	40 	97 	69 	14 	220
Start 	4 	81 	435 	560 	1080
Stub 		3 	216 	989 	1208
List 	2 	3 	9 	12 	26
Assessed 47 	185 	732 	1576 	2540
Unassessed 			1 	1
Total 	47 	185 	732 	1577 	2541

SunCreator (talk) 12:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top Importance?[edit]

The Top importance of these articles seem questionable to me. Looking at conversion to other languages it appears some others agree.

Suggested Top articles that are currently High

ChessCreator (talk) 14:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most adjustments above made. Aron Nimzowitsch left as high. Much cross checking to similar topics and page views (see below) Stalemate and En passant changed to Top. Pending cross-checking High and Mid. Adjournment‎, Chess prodigy, Knight's tour, Comparing top chess players throughout history to High. ChessCreator (talk) 19:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pages views[edit]

Using http://stats.grok.se List contains all Top importance, most Highs and a many mids. Number is approx. average per day.

Note, if the page is arrived at via a re-direct then that redirect view is not counted.

Chess Openings by page views[edit]

Added obvious re-direct names to total, i.e Sicilian Defense + Sicilian Defence added together.

Rank, Page views(average per day), Opening name, Assessment Class

  1. 1000 Chess opening Top
  2. 560 Sicilian Defence/se High
  3. 330 Ruy Lopez High
  4. 275 List of chess openings High
  5. 184 King/'s Gambit High
  6. 170 French Defence/se High
  7. 160 Open Game High
  8. 150 Scholar's mate High
  9. 137 Fool's mate High
  10. 135 Caro-Kann Defence High
  11. 128 English Opening High
  12. 125 Queen's Gambit Declined High
  13. 120 King's Indian Attack Mid
  14. 115 King's Indian Defence High
  15. 101 Alekhine/'s Defence/se Mid
  16. 100 Nimzo-Indian Defence High
  17. 95 Réti Opening High
  18. 82 Indian Defence High
  19. 80 Dutch Defence Mid
  20. 79 Queen's Gambit Accepted Mid
  21. 77 Two Knights Defense High
  22. 73 Scandinavian Defense Mid
  23. 73 Slav Defense High
  24. 71 Latvian Gambit Mid
  25. 70 Scotch Game Mid
  26. 70 Queen's Gambit Accepted Mid
  27. 70 Pirc Defence High
  28. 66 Sicilian Defence, Najdorf Variation Mid
  29. 66 Benoni Defense Mid
  30. 65 Closed Game High
  31. 62 Grünfeld Defence High
  32. 60 Irregular chess opening Low
  33. 60 King's Pawn Game High
  34. 55 Petrov's Defence Mid
  35. 53 Stonewall Attack Low
  36. 51 Grob's Attack Mid
  37. 50 Bird's Opening Mid
  38. 50 Giuoco Piano High
  39. 50 Evans Gambit High
  40. 48 Modern Defense Mid
  41. 48 Queen's Pawn Game High
  42. 48 Queen's Indian Defense High
  43. 46 Budapest Defence Mid
  44. 45 Danish Gambit Mid
  45. 40 Vienna Game Mid
  46. 40 Sokolsky Opening‎ Mid
  47. 40 Four Knights Game Mid
  48. 40 Albin Countergambit Mid
  49. 40 Fried Liver Attack Low
  50. 39 Philidor Defence Mid
  51. 39 Parham Attack Low
  52. 38 Italian Game Mid
  53. 38 Colle System Mid
  54. 35 List of chess gambits Mid
  55. 35 Catalan Opening Mid
  56. 35 Benko Gambit Mid
  57. 35 Hippopotamus Defence Low
  58. 34 Semi-Open Game High
  59. 32 Semi-Slav Defense Mid
  60. 32 Hedgehog_(chess) Low
  61. 31 Anderssen's Opening Low
  62. 30 Bishop's Opening Mid
  63. 30 Blackmar-Diemer Gambit Low
  64. 30 Benko's Opening Low
  65. 29 Larsen's Opening Low
  66. 28 Smith-Morra Gambit Mid
  67. 28 Van 't Kruijs Opening Low
  68. 28 Napoleon Opening Low
  69. 28 List of chess openings named after places Low
  70. 26 Lasker Trap Low
  71. 26 Elephant Trap Low
  72. 25 Barnes Opening Low
  73. 25 Flank opening High
  74. 24 Sicilian Defence, Dragon Variation‎ Mid
  75. 24 Ponziani Opening Mid
  76. 23 Elephant Gambit Low
  77. 23 Dunst Opening Low
  78. 22 Center Game Mid
  79. 22 Mieses Opening Low
  80. 21 Poisoned Pawn Variation Low
  81. 21 Amar Opening Low
  82. 20 Sicilian Defence, Scheveningen Variation Mid
  83. 20 Nimzowitsch Defence Mid
  84. 20 Maróczy Bind Mid
  85. 20 Chigorin Defense Mid
  86. 20 Bogo-Indian Defence Mid
  87. 20 Symmetrical Defense Low
  88. 20 Blackburne Shilling Gambit Low
  89. 20 Semi-Closed Game High
  90. 19 Noah's Ark Trap Low
  91. 19 Marshall Defense Low
  92. 19 Desprez Opening Low
  93. 19 Modern Chess Openings High
  94. 18 Ware Opening Low
  95. 18 Saragossa Opening Low
  96. 17 Tarrasch Defense Mid
  97. 17 Torre Attack Low
  98. 16 St. George Defence Low
  99. 16 Sicilian Defence, Alapin Variation Low
  100. 15 Richter-Veresov Attack Low
  101. 15 Fischer Defense Low
  102. 15 Clemenz Opening Low
  103. 15 Légal Trap High
  104. 14 Sicilian Defence, Accelerated Dragon Low
  105. 14 Monkey's Bum Low
  106. 14 London System Low
  107. 14 Durkin Opening Low
  108. 14 Baltic Defense Low
  109. 13 Ruy Lopez, Exchange Variation Mid
  110. 13 Wing Gambit Low
  111. 13 Englund Gambit Low
  112. 12 King's Indian Defence, Four Pawns Attack Mid
  113. 12 Staunton Gambit Low
  114. 12 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav attack, 9.Bc4 Low
  115. 12 Portuguese Opening Low
  116. 12 Corn Stalk Defense Low
  117. 12 Cambridge Springs Defense Low
  118. 11 Owen's Defense Low
  119. 10 Opening book Mid
  120. 10 Monticelli Trap Low
  121. 10 Magnus Smith Trap Low
  122. 10 Lopez Opening Low
  123. 10 East Indian Defence Low
  124. 10 Boungcloud Attack Low
  125. 10 Black Knights' Tango Low
  126. 9 Old Indian Defense Mid
  127. 9 Damiano Defence Mid
  128. 9 Kingston Defence Low
  129. 9 Alapin's Opening Low
  130. 8 Siberian Trap Low
  131. 8 Rousseau Gambit Low
  132. 8 Lemming Defense Low
  133. 8 Italian Gambit Low
  134. 8 Halosar Trap Low
  135. 8 Greco Defence Low
  136. 8 Fred Defence Low
  137. 8 Frankenstein-Dracula Variation Low
  138. 8 English Defense Low
  139. 8 Adams Defense Low
  140. 7 Polish Defense Low
  141. 6 Trompowsky Attack Low
  142. 6 Tortoise Opening Low
  143. 6 Rubinstein Trap Low
  144. 6 Queen's Knight Defense Low
  145. 6 Neo-Indian Attack Low
  146. 6 Mortimer Trap Low
  147. 6 Falkbeer Countergambit Low
  148. 5 Würzburger Trap Low
  149. 5 Steinitz Variation Low
  150. 5 Marshall Trap Low
  151. 5 Marshall Gambit Low
  152. 5 Konstantinopolsky Opening Low
  153. 5 King's Knight Opening Low
  154. 5 Keres Defence Low
  155. 5 Carr Defense Low
  156. 5 Câmara Defense Low
  157. 4 Wade Defence Low
  158. 4 Rice Gambit Low
  159. 4 Müller-Schulze Gambit Low
  160. 4 Irish Gambit Low
  161. 4 Inverted Hungarian Opening Low
  162. 4 Hungarian Defense Low
  163. 3 Three Knights Opening Mid
  164. 3 Four Pawns Attack Low
  165. 3 Exchange variation Low
  166. 3 Chekhover Sicilian Low
  167. 3 Balogh Defense Low

ChessCreator (talk) 11:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I changed Sicilian Defense to Sician Defence in the articles using AWB, so that should cut out the redirects. Bubba73 (talk), 03:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto French and Alekhine. Bubba73 (talk), 04:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto Caro-Kann. Bubba73 (talk), 05:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Project tag[edit]

I just saw the project tag for the Military History project. For instance, go to Talk:Battle of Bloody Marsh, down to the Military Project box, and click on "show". It gives five criteria for being a B class article, and whether or not they have been met. I'm not asking anyone to do this for our project, since a few people have put in such a large amount of work already. But it is nice! Bubba73 (talk), 15:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you go here you can find all articles according to number of references, so you can find those with no references or few references according to the amount of content. I don't think adding extra info in the assessment template would be productive. It would take a quite a bit of time to assess articles for something like grammar and it would soon get out of date. I think any sort of specific cleanup type work is best written about on the talk page. What way others see the issue and it can be commented on or marked accordingly when done. SunCreator (talk) 23:24, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know it would take a lot of time, I just think it would be nice. But I do like the way they rate them on five criteria rather than counting paragraphs, etc. BTW, I used AWB to change several redirects so some of the traffic figures on that page will be more accurate now. Bubba73 (talk), 23:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure the AWB changes where correct it seems to have changed the displayed words on some articles from America to English or vise versa spelling. I don't think that was the intention of the change and might be worth checking over. SunCreator (talk) 21:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In those four or five openings, I changed occurences in links from "defense" to "defence", since "...ce" is the title of the article. That way you only have to check the stats for the actual article name, for Sicilian, French, Caro-Kann, and Alekhine. Bubba73 (talk), 21:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles by Quality[edit]

 FA A GABCStartStub FLListCategoryDisambigDraftFilePortalProjectRedirectTemplateNA???Total
40461254932,4663,96327792493623281591636188,524
WikiProject chess  articles by quality     Refresh

New categories avilable. See

 FA GABCStartStub FLListCategoryDisambigDraftFileProjectRedirectTemplateNA???Total
000000000000000000
WikiProject Articles for creation  articles by quality     Refresh

SunCreator (talk) 13:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Report of recent tagging run by Xenobot Mk V[edit]

Xenobot recently tagged 47 new articles for this project. They are listed below. –xenotalk 17:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

There is a discussion over at Talk:The Queen's Gambit (miniseries)#quality grading that might interest you. Cheers CapnZapp (talk) 11:28, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]