Wikipedia talk:Userboxitis

Category:Wikipediholism[edit]

SOMEBODY HELP ME GET THIS ARTICLE INTO THE WIKIPEDIHOLISM TEMPLATE!!! Thank you. -- Imadeausername! (talk|contribs) 05:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I feel really stupid now, since if figured out how to do it. Anyway, Userboxitis is now included in the wikipediholism template: Template:Wikipediholism -- Imadeausername! (talk|contribs) 23:03, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a userbox? I think I have Type C. --CrabFreak (talk) 13:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, the reason why i like wikipedia is partly because of articles like these ~~ Faboof ^{(talk)(contribs)} - (June 13 2020 17:12) 17:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's userboxoma!![edit]

Since userboxitis is defined as an excessive number of userboxes, it may be more appropriate to call it "Userboxoma", just like benign tumors.

How about we add something like this:

Some researchers have argued that the current nomenclature is inaccurate since the suffix "-itis" typically denotes inflammation. They proposed the alternative term "Userboxoma". This is derived from the Greek "oma" meaning "tumor" or "swelling", which draws parallels with benign tumors.

What do you think? User579987 (talk) 04:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]