Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/College of Wooster/Introduction to Women's, Gender, and, Sexuality Studies (Spring 2017)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Introduction to Women's, Gender, and, Sexuality Studies
Institution
College of Wooster
Instructor
Jordan Biro Walters
Wikipedia Expert
Shalor (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Course dates
2017-01-16 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-05-05 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
25


This course affords students an opportunity to explore the theories and practices of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (WGSS). Through lectures, readings, media, and discussions, we will examine the emergence of WGSS as an accepted interdisciplinary field, investigate theoretical and methodological innovations, and investigate the historical, social, political, economic, and cultural forces that construct notions of gender and sexuality.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Mtjames20 Lucas Silveira
Emlou9 All-women shortlists
Elinafelt Girl studies Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, Second- wave feminism
Thesaramarie I'll Give You the Sun Girl studies, Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media
Dgenners Angélica Lozano Correa Feminism in Latin America, Sandra Morán
Jinnhee Philippine women's suffrage plebiscite, 1937
Waverly Hart Second- wave feminism Girl studies, I'll Give You the Sun
Hfoust7 Religion and sexuality Transgender people and religion
Emgamez20
Keara8 Lydia Roberts
AngelicaLB International Journal of Transgenderism Lucas Silveira, Lydia Roberts
IWells Mary Dewson Richard LaFortune, Human Rights Campaign
Ehatcher Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media
AMishra19 Transgender people and religion
Lskoglund17 Kathy Kozachenko
Emmagriffith Richard LaFortune Gay Games, Mary Dewson
Collegekid2020 Feminism in Latin America Angélica Lozano Correa, Sandra Morán
MadelineMMay
Kmuthiora20 Women of Kenya
Chloewass Gay Games
Rayrhone4 Harvey Milk Institute All-women shortlists, Lydia Roberts
Mmmaansi
Grace Elliott Sandra Morán Angélica Lozano Correa, Feminism in Latin America
J.J.Angulo Feminism in Lebanon

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Wednesday, 18 January 2017   |   Friday, 20 January 2017
Assignment - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

 Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well. 

 This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia. 

 Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page. 

 To get started, please review the following handouts: 

Assignment - Practicing the basics
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
  • It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
  • When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings
Monday, 23 January 2017   |   Wednesday, 25 January 2017   |   Friday, 27 January 2017

Week 3

Course meetings
Monday, 30 January 2017   |   Wednesday, 1 February 2017   |   Friday, 3 February 2017
In class - Discussion
What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?
Assignment - Critique an article

 It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page. 

  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Choose an article, and consider some questions (but don't feel limited to these): 
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
  •  Choose at least 2 questions relevant to the article you're evaluating. Leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Lskoglund17 (talk) 17:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC). [reply]

Week 4

Course meetings
Monday, 6 February 2017   |   Wednesday, 8 February 2017   |   Friday, 10 February 2017

Week 5

Course meetings
Monday, 13 February 2017   |   Wednesday, 15 February 2017   |   Friday, 17 February 2017
Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  •  The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement. 

Week 6

Course meetings
Monday, 20 February 2017   |   Wednesday, 22 February 2017   |   Friday, 24 February 2017
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?
Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.

  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  •  Find an article. On the "My Articles" section of the overview, assign yourself the article.
  •  In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article. 
    •  Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page. 
    •  Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography. 

Week 7

Course meetings
Monday, 27 February 2017   |   Wednesday, 1 March 2017   |   Friday, 3 March 2017

Week 8

Course meetings
Monday, 6 March 2017   |   Wednesday, 8 March 2017   |   Friday, 10 March 2017
Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  •  Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox
    •  A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas. 

Improving an existing article?

  •  Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox




Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Week 9

Course meetings
Monday, 27 March 2017   |   Wednesday, 29 March 2017   |   Friday, 31 March 2017
Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.
Assignment - Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  •  Select two group members’ articles that you will peer review. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review, and then assign them to yourself in the Review column. 
  •  Peer review your classmates' drafts in their sandbox. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of their sandbox.
  •  As you review, make sure to evaluate the lead, structure, balance/neutrality, and reliability of sources. (See online training for instructions) 
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 10

Course meetings
Monday, 3 April 2017   |   Wednesday, 5 April 2017   |   Friday, 7 April 2017
Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  •  Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions. 
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.

Week 11

Course meetings
Monday, 10 April 2017   |   Wednesday, 12 April 2017   |   Friday, 14 April 2017
Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help!

Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Content Expert at any time!

Week 12

Course meetings
Monday, 17 April 2017   |   Wednesday, 19 April 2017
Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!

Creating a new article?

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
  • You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.