Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Assessment/2016

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This one's a GA nominee so we'll let that process handle it, otherwise it's at least C for sure and could be B as well. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Adventure Kid - It's probably only missing an overhaul in the plot (though it's not necessary) and something on a "production" section (but nothing seems to be available in English). So is it enough for a C? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 23:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can you rearrange the Plot part to an episode listing, and add maybe a summary of the show instead? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Although I did the sourced filmography for her, I still think it's a Stub as per our criterion: "The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant." If a decent biography is written with some sources, then moving it to Start should be automatic. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 22:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
B-Class indeed! --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 10:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should be C. It's missing the list of tankobons (isbn chart?) and the major characters, but the premise is covered for the plot. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 00:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Genkaku Picasso - I thought it was worth a start already in this version because, well, there's no much more than a plot and reception you can add to a 3-volume manga except for development (which can be troublesome to find sometimes) and publication (but well 3 volumes). Nonetheless, I thought it would be better to expand it first before coming here so I've created a "publication" section ([1]), and now I think it's worth a "start". Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bumping from Stub to Start shouldn't need a request unless it's a really borderline case that needs another eye on it. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hanako and the Terror of Allegory – recently created but not assessed (as I'm the main editor I don't want to assess it). Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:00, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • At least start class. This may be C class but someone more experienced should make that assessment so I won't strike (<s>) it. – Allen4names (contributions) 16:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's ready for C. The elaborate Reception section leads me to believe it could be ready for more, or at least a copyedit. Could someone assess this for B? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:25, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
C. Basic stuff is there. Needs a little more referencing and concept stuff. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
B-Class --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 10:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Start for now. Is there a way to fill in the episode list or character list? It's really close to C. Since it is an anime adaptation, would be good to see some anime reviews too. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Reassessed to C class. Detailed criteria needs to be filled in. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Start for now. Half of the episodes and volumes summaries aren't even filled out. No home media section. No reception section. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
C. See why. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 00:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sandy Fox now that she has a biography, could use an updated assessment and feedback as to how to make her article better. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Almost B-Class: Looks like this article is improving nicely. I'll leave some notes on the talkpage. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 09:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
C class. Detailed criteria needs to be filled in. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:39, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]