Wikipedia:Typo Team/moss/For Wiktionary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a special page; putting a Wiktionary link here will cause a word to be ignored by the moss spell checker everywhere it appears (on the assumption it will soon be added to Wiktionary.)

Rejected[edit]

(These will need {{not a typo}} and maybe an HTML comment.)

Vocab pages[edit]

By article title[edit]

0-9[edit]

A[edit]

For Wiktionary[edit]

B[edit]

simultaneously instead of alternately.

C[edit]

It looks like "niru" has been borrowed (at least in this article) into English, since it's getting an English plural, so "niru" and "nirus" should probably be added to Wiktionary. Though I'm unclear on the precise definition of "niru". -- Beland (talk) 00:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Old English words should definitely be in English Wiktionary, but I also tagged it since Old English pronunciation is different. -- Beland (talk) 01:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

F[edit]

H[edit]

J[edit]

  • 1 - JotForm - wikt:esigning: short for "electronic signing" like email for "electronic mail". (But Wikt has "e-signing".)

O[edit]

P[edit]

Q[edit]

U[edit]

V[edit]

Y[edit]

I think it just needs an entry in Wiktionary, then. -- Beland (talk) 19:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By word[edit]

Most common non-English, missing from English Wiktionary[edit]

These words are commonly found in English Wikipedia, are present in a non-English Wiktionary, but are missing from English Wiktionary. Word counts are from English Wikipedia. This is a special report from the 2019-08-20 dump.

Mineral words[edit]

Several pages with lists of minerals are showing up as some of the pages with the most detected typos. Below is a list of words from these pages. I'm pretty sure some of them are misspelled, so they all require verification. I don't see anything in wikt:Wiktionary:CFI that would exclude these names; some but not all of them are IUPAC systematic. We could also add Wikipedia stubs or redirects as needed if Wiktionary doesn't want them. -- Beland (talk) 15:36, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Beland: Wiktionary does want them. We just haven't gotten around to them, as there are tens of thousands of terms along these lines. BD2412 T 01:04, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Problem is the extremely rare ones, or terms only ever used on Wikipedia. These are unwanted on Wiktionary. There are an infinite number of possible chemical names, so there are some criteria for inclusion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect or rare mineral words[edit]

Needs Wikipedia article instead?[edit]

Drugs needing Wikipedia stubs or Wiktionary definitions[edit]