Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 September 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 16 September 18 >

September 17[edit]

Template:Infobox Shinto shrine[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox religious building. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Shinto shrine with Template:Infobox religious building.
Redundancy, following the case with likewise merged Template:Infobox Hindu temple. Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

West Virginia TV network affiliation templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn (non-admin closure) 64222368Z260O talk 64222368Z260O 03:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These templates should all be merged into Template:TV Stations West Virginia as the TV stations could be sorted by network affiliation in one template such as in Template:TV Stations North Dakota, Template:TV Stations Montana and Template:TV Stations Idaho. 2601:587:100:6D8:C4BD:E286:8FE3:EA33 (talk) 23:38, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Infobox settlement[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, incomplete and not needed. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 04:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as a luafication of a template that does not need to be luafied (... and I thought I was the only one who was nominating this kind of module for deletion!) {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 20:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete looks like it is an abandoned attempt to refactor... --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 04:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ptol[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:52, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:United Football League (2009) team[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 25. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Public transport operators in Sydney[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete the Sydney template; no articles currently use the template. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:58, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Public transport operators in Sydney with Template:Infobox Bus transit.
I see no reason for a unique template for 1 page. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Sydney template. Agree with OP. No point, just adds to fragmentation of transit templates. BRES2773 (talk) 17:40, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Sydney. Articles using that template can be easily migrated. BLAIXX 20:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mongolian-Chinese-box[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 25. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Randomtools[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Userfy to User:Brian0918/tables/Randomtools (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only transclusion is in a user page. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mongol[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 25. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:08, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Topics[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Template:Topics and keep Template:Archive box. There is no point continuing discussion so I will close this early as there is unanimous consensus to:

(non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Topics with Template:Archive box.
Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:55, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   ? Ques: What will become of the forced bylines which state Topical archives and Chronological archives if the merge is carried out. Will these be removable?  spintendo  09:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Spintendo: well right now it isn't used at all so I don't see any reason to keep it? But those certainly could be rolled into {{archive box}} if needed...--Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:55, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete template:Topics - basically unused - used in one actual page where no archives are listed Galobtter (pingó mió) 20:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Topics and keep Archive box unchanged. L293D (☎ • ✎) 21:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Topics and keep Archive box unchanged, per above assertions of almost-no use. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per all above. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Topics and leave Archive box unchanged, per above, as the best solution. Miniapolis 13:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete template {{Topics}} and keep template {{Archive box}} just as it is. Please do not merge.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  13:45, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whatever else, keep template {{Archive box}} unchanged. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do what you like to Topics, delete probably, but please leave Archive box alone. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • No opinion on {{topics}} but keep {{archive box}} as is, please. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:06, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Topics and leave Arhive box unchanged as per above. Lepricavark (talk) 15:34, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Topics and keep archive box unchanged. (Swarm ♠ talk) 23:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Topics and keep archive box unchanged as per above and per the fact I currently use the archive box. –Davey2010Talk 00:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kayne West album track list templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant navigation to the {{Kanye West songs}} navigation box, which already groups the songs by album anyway. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:51, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ILIKEIT-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 22:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per nom. the yeezus template has no additional links besides songs, and the links for the life of pablo are not strongly tied to the album (with the exception of the tour, which is already linked in {{Kanye West}}). i do like the idea of grouping the 7-song GOOD music albums as the ye template seems to be getting at, but i think that it would be better to move that template to a more general name if it is kept. Boomur [☎] 18:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nice4What had already created the template i had in mind at {{Wyoming Sessions}}. so, no need to keep {{ye album}} around either. Boomur [☎] 18:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • I will update Wyoming Sessions to include all the relate Ye articles such as "XTCY". Support deletion :) Nice4What (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per nom, replace uses of them with {{Kanye West songs}} if needed. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 01:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per nom; and Frietjes. It really serves no purpose that is already addressed in other navboxes.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 22:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_September_17&oldid=861198310"