Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< November 1 November 3 >

November 2[edit]

Template:FIFA Executive Committee[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and out-of-date Frietjes (talk) 22:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIBA Africa Clubs Champions Cup squads[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, navigation between squad articles is covered by other templates (e.g., Template:FIBA Africa Clubs Champions Cup) Frietjes (talk) 22:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Excideuil[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, former Canton, the communes are now in different Cantons Frietjes (talk) 22:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Evolution theories[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates navigation found in Template:Evolution Frietjes (talk) 22:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Evolutionary biology navbar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates navigation found in Template:Evolution Frietjes (talk) 22:55, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:European Club Association[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and probably too large for a navbox Frietjes (talk) 22:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:European Challenge Cup 2008-09[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and not the current list of teams Frietjes (talk) 22:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EuropeanChampionshipsMedalistsDance[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, current table is in European Figure Skating Championships#Ice dancing Frietjes (talk) 22:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eurobasket 2011 venues[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and not particularly useful for navigation Frietjes (talk) 22:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EuroSrTour player[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 22:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Etymology of 'asteroid' Cunningham 2013[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 22:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ethiopia national football team results[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and all redlinks Frietjes (talk) 22:46, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the sole previous editor. Thank you, I don't think there is a need for a discussion. I have moved this to my user page. —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 23:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Esporte Clube Internacional (SC) squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, out-of-date, and duplicates Esporte Clube Internacional (SC)#Current squad Frietjes (talk) 22:46, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Espionage-side[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates navigation found in Template:Espionage Frietjes (talk) 22:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Erbil Province[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 22:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Election box-NY 20 2006[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates New York's 20th congressional district election, 2006#Results Frietjes (talk) 22:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Economy of the Arab world[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, articles are using other templates instead (e.g., {{Asia in topic|Economy of}}) Frietjes (talk) 22:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EchoCase[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, not clear where it would be used Frietjes (talk) 22:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EBL Men's Division 4 clubs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and out-of-date Frietjes (talk) 22:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dutch municipality population/table row[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 22:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dáil Éireann Members[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, the list articles are using {{Dáil Éireann constituency}} instead Frietjes (talk) 22:32, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dutch folk music[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and no parent article Frietjes (talk) 22:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Japan Academy Award (film) footer[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no longer in use after being removed in early 2016 Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Olympic Champions 4x100 m Men/year[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no longer needed, content is in Template:Footer Olympic Champions 4x100 m Men Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer 2008 Olympic Silver Medalists Gymnastics Men[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

seems odd to navigate between silver medalists. as far as I can tell this is the only silver medalist navbox. Frietjes (talk) 16:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer 2008 Olympic Bronze Medalists Gymnastics Men[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and seems odd to navigate between bronze medalists. as far as I can tell there are no other bronze medalist navboxes. Frietjes (talk) 16:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb wps footer[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb ps header[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb inj header 2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb MLS Eastern Conference club footer[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OlympicYearWinterHeader[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Listed building table header[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I can't even remember what I set these up for and I don't intend to use them. Dave.Dunford (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Box-footer2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, not clear where it would be used Frietjes (talk) 16:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Emibai Jinnah[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't what's role of this template. E. Jinnah herself fails WP:GNG so why we have such template. Störm (talk) 15:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hybrid sport[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Trimming of the unnecessary links is suggested. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not useful as a navigational aid. This is a list masquerading as a navbox. --woodensuperman 12:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 00:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, seems like a reasonable navbox (not too many or too few entries) and there is a parent article, Hybrid sport. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I think if it is kept, it should be trimmed of the non-hybrid sports which are shown in brackets, and only include the sports which are hybrids. That would address my initial concerns I think. --woodensuperman 10:15, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Third Position[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as there is no one defending this particular sidebar template. Please feel free to create a new Third Way or related template if you feel strongly that there should be one. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The contents of the infobox are hopelessly jumbled between far-right groups and the Non-Aligned Movement. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unsure. While the contents of this infobox surely don't reflect the Italian-originated "Third Position" ideology (whose article, I think, tries to expand its scope way too far), I do think there should be a "Third Way" or similar infobox which contains some of the examples used in this one. SpikeballUnion (talk) 20:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 00:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Turkvision Song Contest 2016[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Turkvision 2016 was cancelled, none of the countries listed could have participated in an event that did not happen. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 00:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Turkvision Song Contest 2017[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Turkvision 2017 appears to be cancelled, none of the countries or artists listed can participate in an event that will not happen. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 00:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Recent years[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RY is no longer a guideline per Wikipedia talk:Recent years#RFC: guideline status of this project's inclusion, so this template no longer makes sense. The related edit notice has already been deleted. agtx 03:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would it not make more sense to simply re-word it to reflect that RY is not a guideline? Something along the lines of "Articles about recent years can be rather contentious. Please consult WP:RY for advice based on general consensus about how Wikipedia writes and maintains such articles."? -- irn (talk) 13:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No. In fact, the closer of the RFC rejected exactly that kind of proposal with regard to the edit notice. RY is an essay, and it's not clear that it is even a good source for advice on current consensus. At best, keeping this TP notice around is a form of WP:SQS agtx 14:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not familiar with this RFC you're referring to. Do you have a link? You seem to be implying that the decision to remove the guideline status of RY equates to a total rejection of RY by the community. It may well be rejected by the community in the future, and I think processes are in place right now to that end, but we have yet to see that.
RY is an essay, and it's not clear that it is even a good source for advice on current consensus. Just because it's an essay and not a guideline doesn't mean it's no longer useful. It seems to me like you're arguing that RY is a bad essay and therefore should not be linked from a talk page template where the essay applies. I disagree with you, and I think you need to establish consensus for that.
As RL0919 pointed out, under WP:T2, the template could be speedily deleted for misrepresenting an essay as a guideline. I've changed it to spare it speedy deletion so that we can have this discussion. -- irn (talk) 15:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I do think it's a bad essay, but that's not why I think it should be removed from these talk pages. The reason is because there is not a good reason to push this essay as though it has broad (rather than merely local) consensus. The RFC is linked in my initial comment above. For the closer's comments on the edit notices, see [1] and [2]. agtx 16:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for those diffs; I see where I got confused regarding your comment. Anyway, I think your reasoning makes sense. However, when closing the RFC, the closer noted editors are advised to try to follow by the essay as far as possible, while working in the subject area. I read that as indicating that there is still general consensus regarding the contents of the essay, which would make it acceptable in my mind to have this sort of template on the talk page. Now, reviewing the diffs you provided, I'm not sure I'm interpreting/applying that correctly. @Godric on Leave: if you have the chance, I'd be interested in your opinion. -- irn (talk) 16:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Now that this is not a guideline, it should not be the topic of an article banner. It could even be considered a WP:T2 speedy deletion candidate. --RL0919 (talk) 15:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's a good point, so I've changed it to reflect that it's not a guideline to spare it from speedy deletion while this conversation happens. -- irn (talk) 15:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's a reasonable thing for the immediate concern, but in general we shouldn't have article banners based on essays, so I still believe deletion is the appropriate result for this discussion. --RL0919 (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looking for a more solid consensus given the area of editing this involves.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 00:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brad Pitt as a producer templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete "Brad Pitt as a producer", but no consensus for {{Brad Pitt}}. Please feel free to renominate {{Brad Pitt}} if you would still like to have it deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:29, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly contravenes WP:FILMNAV in that the templates are a collection of films (and in some cases, TV series) someone has produced. A producer is not the "primary creator" of a film or a TV series. —Joeyconnick (talk) 02:25, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_producer Ccawblake see link for more definitions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Grazer Some more food for thought
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Brian_Grazer No Consensus considered for deletion. Ccawblake be fair to all
More of the same below https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amblin_Partners — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccawblake (talk • contribs) 16:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
stop harrassing people, woodensuperman, read above some other comments too, Ccawblake— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccawblake (talk • contribs) 16:14, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There's clearly a WP:COMPETENCE issue at play here. --woodensuperman 16:16, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Compared to good faith, which has been noted before, don't go DELTETING, maybe try editing, thanks woodensuperman! This is up for discussion, and you are just DELETING, which is WRONG! Ccawblake— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccawblake (talk • contribs) 16:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You've been making no end of weird edits. You don't really think that Kilroy (TV series) belongs in {{George Clooney}} do you? --woodensuperman 16:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually, yes, he lives in the UK, as some major actors and producers do. Smile~ 16:49, 31 October 2017 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Clooney_filmography ~ 16:51, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Ccawblake

That's the wrong TV series. But you also don't seem to be able to tell the difference between a TV series and a film, a producer and an executive producer, and you don't seem to have a very good grasp of our MOS. You're just creating a mess. --woodensuperman 16:57, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was only following Wikipedia's page of his filmography. Are you getting nastier? Is that possible? More information and accuracy are always appreciated woodensuperman.~ 17:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Ccawblake The point that needs to be made is that the same template is being used for both directed by and then produced by as is the case with Brian Grazer or Steven Spielberg. When an actor produces and directs what template should you use and can we use words in front of that name to identify the template easier for the person to read. ~ 01:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Ccawblake

  • Comment This debate is being muddled by the fact that the editor who created the nearly duplicate template has attempted to add all of the content that made it slightly more extensive to the original one after votes started coming in to delete his version. I.E., one template had content X and another had content X plus content Y. When Votes started coming in to only delete the one that had content X plus content Y, the content Y was added to the original template and then delete all votes started coming in.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:59, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Producer navboxes are still problematic. The sheer number of navboxes on Moneyball (film) is a good example of why we should be restricting filmographies in navboxes to directors (and possibly writers). --woodensuperman 16:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looking for comments on apparent attempt to move content from one template to the other after this discussion began.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 00:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the former, delete the latter. Some of the articles linked in the latter navbox don't actually mention Pitt. Jc86035 (talk) 08:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_November_2&oldid=1138373344"