Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 6[edit]

Template:Neozapatismo[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 16:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

only transcluded in one article. Frietjes (talk) 16:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kids Films and TV Shows[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 16:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno... I know WP:NENAN isn't actually Wikipedia policy, but this reeks of being superfluous and unnecessary. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, definitely WP:OR, and if this were completed, would have a massive number of entries. please nip this in the bud. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete: If we were to compile every single kids' show and film into a single template, we'd never get anything else done. So yeah, kill this one with fire. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 21:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete. Too broad to provide useful navigation. --Rob Sinden (talk) 16:36, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tampa Breeze roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 16:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Team was renamed to Jacksonville Breeze and currently not playing in the LFL. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, don't need a roster for a non-existing team. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sahara Pune Warriors Roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 16:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This team was dissolved in 2013. Also, the article for this team is located at Pune Warriors India, MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, don't need a roster for a non-existing team. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sacramento Monarchs current roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈(discuss) 16:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded template since the team disbanded in 2009. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, don't need a roster for a non-existing team. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No current transclusions either.—Bagumba (talk) 11:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. There is no "current roster" for this defunct team. Rikster2 (talk) 17:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).