Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 July 17

< July 16	July 18 >

July 17[edit]

Template:Cleanup-weighted-section[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:51, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cleanup-weighted-section (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

1. Not in use at all. {{Cleanup-weighted}} itself is in use on 11 pages only. 2. I can easily add a section parameter to {{Cleanup-weighted}}. Debresser (talk) 16:50, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done that. Debresser (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it doesn't use the section sized box... someone should fix that. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 05:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete now obsolete Curb Chain (talk) 03:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely redundant. --Cybercobra (talk) 07:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Mask[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Mask (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Currently contains eight titles. The first group has four, none of them actually articles. Two of those recently failed to get through the AfD process, see here and here. That leaves only four entries: two films and two 'Related articles'. Not enough to warrant a navbox. This should go. Cheers, theFace 12:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Despite the AFD's, the template remains helpful.--Yankees10 15:49, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have cleaned up the template (which you created) by removing the four non-entries, leaving four links. Thanks... I guess. Do you really think this should be kept? I wonder what the convention is here. WP:NAVBOX gives no minimum on the sizes of navboxes, although it does state that they "should not be too small". Cheers, theFace 18:40, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The five articles should be sufficiently inter linked without the 'box. - J Greb (talk) 16:59, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nicole Wray[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nicole Wray (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant. Only links three pages, which already link to each other. Cloudz679 (talk) 09:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NENAN. Three articles is too few for a navbox to be useful. Robofish (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Greater Western Sydney Football Club[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Greater Western Sydney Football Club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplication of an existing template (Template:Greater Western Sydney Giants). Template was created by User:Thegamemuster a minute after editing the existing template. Ignorant Armies^?! 04:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ¡Boz zio! 05:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: duplicate template. Laboulaye (talk) 09:19, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.