Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 2

< August 1	August 3 >

August 2[edit]

Template:ASUS Eee Family[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —fetch ·comms 00:08, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ASUS Eee Family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to section already appearing in Template:ASUS Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:03, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unneeded. Imzadi 1979 → 06:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as wholly redundant to a section in a more comprehensive template. Airplaneman ✈ 23:42, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cairns Taipans[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —fetch ·comms 00:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cairns Taipans (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template, and there is already a roster in Cairns Taipans Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unneeded. Imzadi 1979 → 06:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unneeded. Airplaneman ✈ 23:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Article about Wikipedia[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —fetch ·comms 21:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Article about Wikipedia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I'm not sure why this is needed? Is this a WP:Disclaimer? In any event, it is currently orphaned. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unneeded, is it even in line with policies/guidelines (eg. - It may differ from Wikipedia's official policies and guidelines)? Connormah^talk 00:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yeah, lots of little reasons but per above. Imzadi 1979 → 06:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—I can't imagine how this will ever be useful. –Grondemar 03:45, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2002 FIFA World Cup qualification[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —fetch ·comms 21:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2002 FIFA World Cup qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation box with no navigation Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom. Connormah^talk 00:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NENANEIIDDA (not everything needs a navbox, especially if it doesn't do anything) Imzadi 1979 → 06:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Beaumont[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete (non-admin closure) on author request.Train2104 (talk) 00:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Beaumont (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. There are already quite a few navigation boxes at the bottom of Beaumont, Texas, and it appears this one is redundant to the existing boxes. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This template was created by accident, I didn't know how to delete it. ThomasHorn7 (talk) 23:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Per user request, CSD template applied. Train2104 (talk) 23:18, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Arabictrans[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:48, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arabictrans (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Newly created, orphaned and deprecated? Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks deprecated to me, odd enough Imzadi 1979 → 06:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SabresFirstPick[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SabresFirstPick (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

User:Stevenparkie placed a CSD tag on this with the invalid reason of "orphaned template". Since that is a valid argument here at TfD, I am bringing it up. Train2104 (talk) 22:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete orphaned. Imzadi 1979 → 06:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Technically I think they were trying to use criteria T3 which is unused redundant template. The hockey project has been replacing all these templates with succession boxes. -DJSasso (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Test1a[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —fetch ·comms 00:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Test1a (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template has been replaced by the standardized UW template Template:uw-delete1 in furtherance of Wikipedia:WikiProject user warnings, reflecting the latest consensus on the content of a template of this purpose. Bsherr (talk) 20:47, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—the new template clearly supersedes. –Grondemar 03:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as superseded. Airplaneman ✈ 23:50, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:VCRW[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:VCRW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template has been replaced by the standardized UW template Template:uw-vandalism3 in furtherance of Wikipedia:WikiProject user warnings, reflecting the latest consensus on the content of a template of this purpose. Bsherr (talk) 20:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—the new template clearly supersedes. –Grondemar 03:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Various obsolete SEPTA templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:20, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/SEPTA_left/R1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_left/R2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_left/R3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_left/R5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_left/R6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_left/R7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_left/R8 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_right/R1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_right/R2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_right/R3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_right/R5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_right/R6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_right/R7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S-line/SEPTA_right/R8 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:R1 (SEPTA)-infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:R2 (SEPTA)-infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:R3 (SEPTA)-infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:R5 (SEPTA)-infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:R6 (SEPTA)-infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:R7 (SEPTA)-infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:R8 (SEPTA)-infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These have been rendered obsolete with the new SEPTA Regional Rail naming scheme. All are orphaned. Train2104 (talk) 18:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obsolete. This loos like non-controversial housekeeping to me. Imzadi 1979 → 10:27, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Dough 48 72 01:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note to admin: {{S-line/SEPTA_right/R7}} and {{S-line/SEPTA_left/R7}} are redirects. Their targets SHOULD NOT be deleted. —Train2104 (talk · contribs · count · email) 13:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dutch town locator maps[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —fetch ·comms 21:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dutch town locator maps (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per the discussion on the talk page, this template has been orphaned, with all transclusions converted to a maps section in {{Infobox settlement}}. This could probably be deleted per CSD G7 or T3, but I thought I would first discuss it here. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no longer needed. -- Whpq (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Imzadi 1979 → 06:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Com[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete, CSD G6. Kimchi.sg (talk) 10:21, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Com (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Just type the word out, you don't need a template to create links to Commons. Axem Titanium (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Imzadi 1979 → 06:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4—this template was already reviewed at TfD when it was named Template:Cmscat and was closed as Delete. Instead of being deleted, the template was moved to another name. SeeWikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_June_9#Template:Cmscat as reference. –Grondemar 03:53, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Imparja[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Imparja (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox to interlink three already well-linked articles. There is minimal scope for more articles to be added to this navbox. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:52, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NENAN. Imzadi 1979 → 06:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tampa Bay Devil Rays roster navbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Already deleted by Explicit under CSD G5 (banned user). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tampa Bay Devil Rays roster navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

User:DevilRayssSoap made a bunch of vandalous edits to Tampa Bay Rays-related articles and creating new categories to expand this tired "joke". Zeng8r (talk) 02:21, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-Nevermind: template is up for speedy deletion and user has been blocked... Zeng8r (talk) 02:36, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.