Wikipedia:Peer review/Open-source license/archive1

Open-source license[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm planning to nominate for GA review soon. Feedback of any type is welcome. A few places where I'd like to get outside input are: [a] Some licenses/cases have the primary source cited as well; does that help others with verification, or should I just omit those? [b] Are there places where I've over-explained anything? [c] And are there places where a deeper explanation is needed.

Thanks, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720[edit]

After a quick skim, I do not notice any immediate problems. I think this can be nominated to GAN as-is and a reviewer will take a closer look. A minor quibble: typically the lede doesn't have in-text citations, so if this information is in the body of the article these citations can be removed. Z1720 (talk) 20:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 03:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]