Wikipedia:Peer review/Hi-Level/archive1
Hi-Level[edit]
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it's expanded to the point where I'm thinking about good article status, but the article has been a one-person effort and I'd appreciate thorough review from a third party. I've tried (perhaps unsuccessfully) to avoid burdening the article with railfan jargon.
Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 14:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Direct nomination I've reviewed your request and I think it would be suitable for direct nomination. I cannot see any issues that couldn't be ironed out during the nomination process. Sorry for how long you've had to wait for this. Good luck!
Always nice to read a page about trains :). I think this article has a good chance of meeting the good article criteria and would benefit from a nomination directly there. Sorry for the long wait, there are only a few of us at PR. --Tom (LT) (talk) 06:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- @LT910001: Thank you kindly, I'll do that. Best, Mackensen (talk) 16:22, 16 January 2016 (UTC)