Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Well-Tempered Clavier, Book I

The Well-Tempered Clavier, Book I[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 20:19:33 (UTC)

Extended content

Prelude No. 1 in C major

Fugue No. 1 in C major

Prelude No. 2 in C minor

Fugue No. 2 in C minor

Prelude No. 3 in C♯ major

Fugue No. 3 in C♯ major

Prelude No. 4 in C♯ minor

Fugue No. 4 in C♯ minor

Prelude No. 5 in D major

Fugue No. 5 in D major

Prelude No. 6 in D minor

Fugue No. 6 in D minor

Prelude No. 7 in E♭ major

Fugue No. 7 in E♭ major

Prelude No. 8 in E♭ minor

Fugue No. 8 in D♯ minor

Prelude No. 9 in E major

Fugue No. 9 in E major

Prelude No. 10 in E minor

Fugue No. 10 in E minor

Prelude No. 11 in F major

Fugue No. 11 in F major

Prelude No. 12 in F minor

Fugue No. 12 in F minor

Prelude No. 13 F♯ major

Fugue No. 13 in F♯ major

Prelude No. 14 in F♯ minor

Fugue No. 14 in F♯ minor

Prelude No. 15 in G major

Fugue No. 15 in G major

Prelude No. 16 in G minor

Fugue No. 16 in G minor

Prelude No. 17 in A♭ major

Fugue No. 17 in A♭ major

Prelude No. 18 in G♯ minor

Fugue No. 18 in G♯ minor

Prelude No. 19 in A major

Fugue No. 19 in A major

Prelude No. 20 in A minor

Fugue No. 20 in A minor

Prelude No. 21 in B♭ major

Fugue No. 21 in B♭ major

Prelude No. 22 in B♭ minor

Fugue No. 22 in B♭ minor

Prelude No. 23 in B major

Fugue No. 23 in B major

Prelude No. 24 in B minor

Fugue No. 24 in B minor

Reason: The Well-Tempered Clavier is said to be among the most important works in the history of classical music. This is a good recording of the entire first book by a notable pianist, Kimiko Ishizaka.[1]
Articles in which this image appears: The Well-Tempered Clavier and its many sub-articles + others
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: Composed by Johann Sebastian Bach, performed by Kimiko Ishizaka

Support as nominator – --- Coffeeandcrumbs 20:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support having this as featured content. But listings here are explicitly for featured pictures. There appears to be no other more general featured content process, and a former featured sound project was discontinued in 2011. Is this the right way to reinstate sounds as featured content? —David Eppstein (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess, in a way, I am advocating a merger/expansion of scope. Perhaps a change, to Wikipedia:Featured media and "Today's featured media". This may require an RfC since there are implications on the Main Page. I was testing the waters. IMO, it is not a large leap. We already feature videos, films, why not music, sound? --- Coffeeandcrumbs 07:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'd say revive Wikipedia:Featured sounds, but list all media nominations on the same page. Sounds are assessed in a different way than pictures. MER-C 11:13, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - I partially agree with MER-C, but the nominations shouldn't be listed on the same page. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - I assumed that WP:FS died because of low participation. Wouldn't a separate nomination page doom any revival to the same fate? --- Coffeeandcrumbs 15:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      - That's what just happened on Commons, I think. If we were to credibly revive featured sounds, we need to solve the participation in nominations problem somehow. MER-C 17:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        I like the idea of featured sounds. It would be nice to vote for them on this page if feasible. Bammesk (talk) 04:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Coffeeandcrumbs and others that it would best to hold FS noms here. We already do videos, animations, etc. Geoffroi 21:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That’s because videos and animations have a visual element, which audio files lack. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Featured videos usually have to have high audio quality, but that's probably just splitting hairs... Geoffroi 22:30, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geoffroi 06:46, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, ineligible. I am not in principle opposed to bringing sounds into this process, but I thijnk we need to have a discussion about changing the policies/prodcedures. We can't just start nominating them here. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support as featured media. It appears that we do have media that went to FPC in the past. Taewangkorea (talk) 22:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Movies are within scope because they are moving pictures (it's in the name). MER-C 18:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - We don't have the voters for a separate nom page, so if they're not listed here they'll be invisible and neglected. Geoffroi 01:36, 21 November 2019 (UTC
    - It doesn't really matter, because Featured sounds is inactive, and these can't be promoted as featured pictures (as they are not mentioned in the featured picture criteria, while videos are). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      - I wouldn't go so far as to say it doesn't matter. It's a loss to Wikipedia to let these sound nominations descend into the void and be forgotten and neglected. Geoffroi 17:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]