Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Indian national cricket captains/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by User:Matthewedwards 22:36, 24 August 2008 [1].
Indian national cricket captains[edit]
previous FLC (17:29, 24 November 2005)
There are mostly minor issues here, but the number of them is quite big.
- Too many single years are linked
- Too many links to India national cricket team
- The note about " a dagger (†)" should be placed better
- In sub-section Test match captains, the table heading is "Indian Test match captains", which is redundant. This goes to most subsections.
- The column "played" needs an explanation. Why teams play each other more than once in one year?
- Do we really need "total" row for captains, who played only one team?
- "Includes one Tied Test Match" needs an explanation. What's the difference between a tied match and a drawn match?
- The "Asian Test Championship" note shows that India played first in India, then in Sri Lanka, but the Championship was held in Bangladesh.
- In Records and highlights subsections, there is uncited information throughout the page.
- Footnotes should be separated from the citations in the References section.
--Crzycheetah 07:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- These are all very easy to correct. For deletion review see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Alternatives_to_deletion Lihaas (talk) 05:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove unless improved.
- "this list"—The list, please, which is grammatically better and avoids iss iss.
- "of Men's cricket, Women's cricket and Youth cricket"—why the caps? MoS breach. Please remove two instances of "cricket".
- MoS breach in "1960/1" and numerous others: the closing year must be two or four digits. En dashes required for year ranges at the bottom. Single years shouldn't be linked: I'll fix the last issue now.
- Remove the thousands of percentage signs in the final column, since the key at the top clearly announces "%". Easier to read, then.
- Remove "percentage": "the highest percentage win rate (56%)".
Look, the text needs a thorough audit. It's worth saving. Can we gather together a team of people to call on when Indian sports lists come up for review? Is there an appropriate WikiProject we can lean on? Tony (talk) 06:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PS Can someone inform me soon if the date script I've run has caused any problems? And revert if so. Looks OK to me. Tony (talk) 06:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The intro is very skewed.
- Why two lines about the "seven Tests before 1947", and the 1947 tour, which are irrelevant/unimportant for the article.
- Putting 1983 and 1999-U19 in the same line is a bit of a joke (there was also another U-19 win in 2007 and a U-15 in 1996, by the way)
- You can't unhesitatingly call 1983 the greatest success because there are Test wins, for eg, 1971 and 2001 which are extremely important. Tintin 06:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Closing comments - Despite the concerns being addressed, the list still fails to meet our criteria in certain areas. Opening sentences that contain "This is a list of..." are no longer in favour, and prose still needs tightening (bolded for effect): "They played only seven tests", "On 25 June 1932 it became the Test nation", "Their first game against other opposition came in", "Also,". Proes also contains hyphens in place of n/m-dashes. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 22:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
previous FLR (22:36, 24 August 2008)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.