Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Led Zeppelin IV/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 01:05, 18 July 2011 [1].

---

Led Zeppelin IV

Led Zeppelin IV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured article candidates/Led Zeppelin IV/archive1

Nominator(s): (Cowik (talk) 22:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

This article is looks clean, the sources look legit, they're many pictures to describe the album, and the article is at a good length and is very easy to read. It is also a really popular album, I think the article has potential. Cowik (talk) 22:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Comment This seems to be a drive-by nomination and should be removed. The article is far from FA standard based on all the criteria. Graham Colm (talk) 22:14, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

• File:Lzsleeve2.jpg is gratuitous, it should be removed. I'm not going to do a full image review until this is closer to being FA ready. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:59, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Procedural close - nominator is not a significant contributor and has not consulted with the primary author prior to nomination, as is required by the FAC instructions. If the nominator is serious about working this article up to FA status, I would recommend initiating a peer review, as the article is not currently FA ready. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.