Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/December to Dismember (2006)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted 04:25, 4 November 2007.
December to Dismember (2006)[edit]
Article was failed mainly based on whether WrestleView sources were reliable or not, see here. I, along with the help of Nikki311 for finding the sources, have replaced virtually all of the WrestleView sources. Please note there are still two in the article. One is just a report source, and the other is about the Sabu issue, but have clarified that it was a "major rumor". Please also note that Raul654 has allowed me to nominate this so soon after it was not promted. Thanks, and I look forward to the comments, Davnel03 20:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support The article is well-written and comprehensive. It makes use of appropriate terms (with internal links) to make it clear that professional wrestling is not real. The references look good, as the editors have done a great job at addressing concerns from the past Featured Article review. Overall, the article is a great example of what every wrestling pay per view article could (and hopefully will) become. GaryColemanFan 13:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support The article covers the event in the appropriate depth and length. It is easy to read with the information delivered in a structured and consistent manner. --Aaru Bui DII 16:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Not because I'm also part of WP:PW, but it is very well written, good sources, good structure overall. This would very well be a standard structure for all PPV expansions. The Chronic 00:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - The previous issues have been intended, and I believe the article is ready for Fac now. Cheers, Lex94 00:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment- The only users that have supported this nomination are members of WP:PW Lex94 00:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lex94 (talk • contribs)
- That doesn't really affect this, though does it? If anyone else had a problem with it (like last time) they would comment. Davnel03 19:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Your right. But it would be better if other users outside WP:PW could review the article, but we can't hope for it, because not much people outside of WP:PW have an interesnt in EVER reading these articles...Lex94 Talk Contributions Signatures 20:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Lex is definately right. Most other Wikiprojects tend to look down on this one, and wrestling is hardly mainstream anymore. But we can hope. Gavyn Sykes 20:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Your right. But it would be better if other users outside WP:PW could review the article, but we can't hope for it, because not much people outside of WP:PW have an interesnt in EVER reading these articles...Lex94 Talk Contributions Signatures 20:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't really affect this, though does it? If anyone else had a problem with it (like last time) they would comment. Davnel03 19:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support An insane amount of time and effort by Davnel and others took this article from a match listing within another article to a legimately sourced good article. I believe it is ready for FA. Gavyn Sykes 20:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pass & support - On the basis that it's fine until one day standards are improved. Leranedo 03:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.