Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FastilyBot 11

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

FastilyBot 11[edit]

Operator: Fastily (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 22:57, Monday, June 6, 2016 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Java

Source code available: When I have written it

Function overview: Simple maintenance task which fills in missing date parameter for {{Now Commons}} in Category:Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of unknown date

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): n/a

Edit period(s): Daily

Estimated number of pages affected: ~50 per month

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: See above -FASTILY 22:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Approved for trial (50 edits or 15 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Initial trial approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Done, everything worked as expected: [1] -FASTILY 06:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Special:Diff/724275957, you dated the file as tagged today, but it was actually tagged two days ago. I guess this doesn't matter, though. Shouldn't a date also be added to the files in Category:Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons as of unknown date? --Stefan2 (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The bot is scheduled to run daily when approved, so there's no point in writing complicated (and error-prone) code which attempts to resolve supposed tag date. Category:Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons as of unknown date is not part of this task, because of low demand (very few files have a different transferred name on Commons) and because it'll require separate logic (e.g. parsing the {{Now Commons}} template). I'll consider doing this in the future if there is a demand for it. -FASTILY 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. What happens if a file in Category:Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of unknown date uses the bot or reviewer parameters? --Stefan2 (talk) 12:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's no other active bot adding {{Now Commons}} to any pages, and I'll be filtering reviewed files based on Category:Wikipedia files reviewed on Wikimedia Commons -FASTILY 18:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} If there are no other objections, could this be approved please, thanks. Also, ping for @Xaosflux. -FASTILY 23:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.