Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Anomie

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for BAG membership. Please do not modify it.

Closed as successful. Kingturtle (talk) 13:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BAG Nomination: Anomie[edit]

Anomie (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

I'm nominating Anomie for BAG because I've seen him around the bot pages a good deal, he knows the layout and function of BAG, and seems like he can be trusted and is up to the task. MBisanz ^talk 02:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate acceptance: I accept. I've had 14 BRFAs approved for AnomieBOT, I've written the API used by AnomieBOT myself, and I've been watching the bot-related pages for a while and trying to comment where I've had something to contribute. I know Perl, PHP, Javascript, and C fairly well, and a few other languages less well; I've even contributed a patch or two to MediaWiki. Anomie ⚔ Anomie ⚔ 03:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support As nom. MBisanz ^talk 02:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Uses Perl. BJ^Talk 03:18, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good, clueful user. X clamation point 03:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per past experience with this knowledgeable, trustworthy editor who will make an excellent addition to the BAG. --Kralizec! (talk) 04:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support past experience indicates user is more than capable of being an effective BAG member. —Nn123645 (talk) 04:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm known for being anti-bot, but I've never been against a bot that tags articles -- I find them extraordinarily useful. And if this user wrote one that does that, it's good enough for me. Useight (talk) 06:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tawker (talk) 07:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appears to be a very diligent botop who shows the promise of being a viable member to BAG. Maybe BRFAs will go a bit quicker now! :P §hep • ¡Talk to me! 03:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Going to help out. Lego K^ontribs T^alkM 23:16, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Page is a clear violation of WP:BLP... only joking, Support. Anomie helps out a lot, and deserves the role. ~-F.S-~(Talk,Contribs,Online?) 08:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support He does great work and is pretty CLUEful with bots. Will be an asset. :-) So Why 12:22, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above BAG membership discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.