User talk:Zwiq
Welcome[edit]
Welcome!
Hello, Zwiq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
November 2023[edit]
Hi Zwiq! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Jews for Racial and Economic Justice several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Andre🚐 01:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, it was a truthful version of events and I already filled an edit warring complaint against the user who kept undoing my edits despite providing numerous sources of info. Zwiq (talk) 03:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 02:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Unblock[edit]
Zwiq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It was wrong to block me because I was trying to correct someone else's edit warring. I provide plenty of sources for my edit and provided an explanation on the talk page, and proof that the other editor kept reverting my changes despite his reasoning being false. I also did not engage in socking. Which is a strange accusation, as I have only edited under this user name. I believe the other editor has a conflict of interest as well. My IP is not 172.85.41.84 as mentioned by admin
Decline reason:
Edit warring to stop edit warring is not an acceptable justification, as everyone in an edit war thinks that they are correct. 331dot (talk) 08:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
November 2023[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 22:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Zwiq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not create multiple accounts. I only have this account. Zwiq (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The other account was created after this one was blocked and edited the same topic that you had edit warred in. Pretty clear to me. 331dot (talk) 07:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
UTRS appeal #81289 is closed.[edit]
This needs discussion on user talk page. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Unblock Attempt[edit]
Zwiq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'd like a review of my blocking by a different admin, it doesn't seem just that they can simply assume (wrongly and without evidence) that I have made multiple accounts to edit. The page I edited is about a group that is in the crosshairs of many other people and organizations . Particularly because they have platformed pedophiles and of their stance on the Israel/Palestine War. Also the user who was originally reverting my changes also seemed to have a conflict of interest with that page. Everything I wrote was factual.
Decline reason:
The rest of your request, and what you wrote below, is irrelevant to why you were blocked, regardless of the efforts you may have gone to to convince yourself that it isn't. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:25, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.