User talk:Zezzoo24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Book of Ingenious Devices, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 06:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my concern is just with the origin of banu musa which you wrote they were Persians, banu musa as their Wikipedia page says they are “unknown pedigree“ so I thought it’s more accurate to not mention the origin. For your kind, thank you. Zezzoo24 (talk) 11:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing and possible sockpuppetry[edit]

Hi Zezzoo24, you have been making edits that violate Wikipedia's core policies including verifiability, neutral point of view, original research, and/or possibly others. Here are the two main issues:

  1. Many of your edits are removing sourced content and inserting unsourced or dubious material which appear to push a personal opinion or point of view, in particular by removing mentions of non-Arab peoples (such as Berbers or Persians) and often replacing them with mentions of Arab ethnicity instead. This may be considered disruptive editing and may even be considered vandalism. This is most evident in your recent edits to the Ali ibn al-Athir, Emirate of Granada and Emirate of Sicily pages on January 15 and 16, as well as in at least one earlier edit you made here.
  2. From a quick look at the edit history of those same pages, it also looks very likely that you are attempting to repeat your edits anonymously through other IP addresses such as this one and this one. Even if these were unintentional, this violates Wikipedia's policy on "sockpuppetry": in other words, it makes it look like you're pretending that multiple people support your changes when in fact it is only you. If you would like to edit the encyclopedia, please use only one account while editing.

As some friendly advice: if you are genuinely interested in improving the encyclopedia, please take these issues seriously and make sure your future editing is in line with Wikipedia policies. You should also listen to the feedback of other editors and try to solicit consensus for changes if someone else disagreed with them, by simply going to the talk page and explaining the changes you think should be made. If consensus is against your changes, you need to respect this. Lastly, of course, you are always expected to cite reliable sources to support any changes or additions to pages, unless they are cosmetic changes like fixing typos. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox.

Any further disruptive edits, or any use of sockpuppetry, may result in the loss of editing privileges. R Prazeres (talk) 03:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know if you going to believe me, but I don’t have any other IP addresses. Zezzoo24 (talk) 08:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zezzoo24, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]