User talk:Yaik9a

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Poop deck , did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits[edit]

I've reverted your edit to Canadian federal election, 2008, as it messed up the article's formatting. Is there something I can help you with? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 19:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to leave the forthcoming election infobox in the article until we've got the results; then we can put in the past election infobox. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 19:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nihilism has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -- IRP ☎ 00:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User talk:IRP has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 02:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption[edit]

Hello. If you are still looking for an adopter, I'd be happy to adopt you. » \ / (⁂ | ※) 01:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, great! I'll prepare a few quick things for you to look at, policy and the like. See here for your adoption page. » \ / (⁂ | ※) 22:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edit to Israel[edit]

Hello Yaik9a. I was checking your contributions and noticed this edit. I strongly urge you to read WP:NPOV, as that edit is completely unacceptable given the viewpoints you have expressed on your userpage. ∗ \ / (⁂) 01:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yaik9a. You have new messages at Backslash Forwardslash's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

War in Peace's lack of sources[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you created War in Peace, but listed no sources for the information contained in the article. According to Wikipedia's content policies, all information must be verifiable from reliable sources. Therefore, it's necessary to cite your sources so other editors can check that the information included in the article is correct and matches the sources used. Information not previously published in such sources is prohibited as original research, since other editors can't verify it. Unsourced information may be challenged and removed at any time, and articles that can't be verified are likely to be deleted. Guidance on how to cite your sources is available, and if you need any further help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.--Unscented (talk) 19:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption[edit]

Hi. Given you haven't been too active during the last month(s), I'm going to be formally ending the adoption in seven days unless you feel a need to keep it going. Best of luck with your editing either way. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 14:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Ronald Reagan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --William S. Saturn (talk) 02:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, you will be blocked from editing. This notice is for two such edits. Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to James M. Hill Memorial High School have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ginsuloft (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to James M. Hill Memorial High School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hogie75 16:37, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ... discospinster _talk 19:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]