User talk:Wikichap33

Welcome!

Hello, Wikichap33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

Your account presents the appearance of existing only to add links to a specific web site to wikipedia. That would be in violation of our spam guidelines, so I advise caution if you are not trying to promote that web site. If that is your own web site, please know that we all refrain from adding links to our own web sites, so as to avoid any conflict of interest. If your web site really is the best source of information, someone else will add it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to All Good Things (Come to an End). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:59, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikichap33 (talk) 23:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC) Sorry, I should have read the guidelines and all that before. The links I was trying to post are not meant to be for promotion. I really like that website and I think there is great information there for the song entries I edited. Anyway, I'll follow your advice and put my suggestions in the discussion sections... and let others decide if those links are relevant enough. Thanks for your information[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Whatcha Say. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:39, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That message makes reference to the same links I posted in 2008. I did learn then it was not a good thing and stopped doing it... and learned more about good practices in Wikipedia. Sorry it took me 13 years to replay! Wikichap33 (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fray Leon de San Jose (January 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Far too much of the content is unreferenced, and some of what look like references are actually more like explanatory notes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fray Leon de San Jose and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikichap33! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roman temple of Augustobriga (March 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iazyges was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roman temple of Augustobriga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:31, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roman temple of Augustobriga (July 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article reads almost like a blog post or article about the temple at the moment - it needs a solid rewrite to be more neutral and encyclopedic before it can be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roman temple of Augustobriga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 06:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Too much for me I guess. After so many changes in format and references now the problem is that "it reads like a blog post". Too general for me to know how to fix that, so you guys can delete the article any time. Someone in the future may write a good article about it which is good enough for wikipedia. I will send my draft to some blog dealing with Roman architecture, since it is already cut for that.

At least I tried.

Thanks for the revisions anyway Wikichap33 (talk) 16:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fray Leon de San Jose (July 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article is currently written like a narrative. Consider checking out the existing BLP of other historical figures to see how a formal, encyclopedic tone can be achieved.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fray Leon de San Jose and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 01:04, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need to wait for six months, you guys can delete the article right now, I worked too much on it but it's not good enough so let someone else pick up the character again in the future and start from scratch. Wikichap33 (talk) 16:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Roman temple of Augustobriga[edit]

Hello, Wikichap33. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roman temple of Augustobriga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roman temple of Augustobriga[edit]

Hello, Wikichap33. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roman temple of Augustobriga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fray Leon de San Jose[edit]

Hello, Wikichap33. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fray Leon de San Jose".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]