User talk:Wajaskifli

Rovás[edit]

Wajaskifli, It's great that you're editing, but you really can't change the English language terminology just by making changes to the Wikipedia. That's Original Research and is against Wikipedia policy. -- Evertype·✆ 19:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, what is it that you think you are achieving with your un-encyclopaedic edits to these articles? You're not fooling anyone. You're not convincing anyone. You're not adding value to the Wikipedia. -- Evertype·✆ 21:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Evertype: do not change Old Hungarian into Szekler-Hungarian Rovas. Instead of deleting please use both names. The reason is that there are different proposals for encoding "Old Hungarian Script", and these proposals has different names. Please follow wikipedia rule: neutrality. Do not change the English language terminology just by making changes to the Wikipedia.... Wajaskifli (talk) 21:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a bit ridiculous. The term "Szekler-Hungarian Rovas" is not the term used in the English language, whether or not you are using it. Would you like me to start to introduce Ősi Magyarírás into your language? No, you would not. Nor would I try to, out of respect. You are trying to introduce this term into English. That does not make it English, and it does not belong on the English Wikipedia. -- Evertype·✆ 22:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]