User talk:WPUNJ

Welcome![edit]

Hi WPUNJ! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 18:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm FMSky. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 04:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Carl Thomas (singer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 18:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 18:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discogs , execs[edit]

Please don't use discogs as source, see WP:RSPSS. Please don't add executive producers, see WP:NOEXEC. --Muhandes (talk) 13:59, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that in this edit to Lloyd Banks, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 05:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Big[edit]

@WPUNJ: Hey on the Notorious B.I.G. page can you add Charli Balimore 1995–1997 thank you

Disambiguation link notification for November 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flesh of My Flesh, Blood of My Blood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Prodigy (rapper), you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 16:23, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lil' Troy. Rob van vee 07:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don Cartagena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gangsta Rap.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary[edit]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 11:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Earl Ray. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 19:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Big Pun. Binksternet (talk) 03:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 06:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at King Von. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sean Combs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carl Thomas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sean Combs. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits to album articles[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik and Reasonable Doubt (album), you may be blocked from editing. Sir Teflon (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rafer Alston, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 02:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tha Block Is Hot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gangsta Rap.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Neo the Twin (talk) 03:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. 50 Cent is a record executive. He is the owner of G-Unit Records and is the executive producer of many albums. I'm going to put up he's a record executive again because that's what he is. WPUNJ (talk) 03:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Money Trees. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 50 Cent. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 50 Cent shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:NinjaRobotPirate. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. --Yamla (talk) 19:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at No Malice, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 13:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited On Fire (Lloyd Banks song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Resto.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Continued addition of unsourced content to biography articles[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly certain that this will be your last timed blocked. If you continue to edit disruptively and make unsourced changes to biography articles once this block expires, your next block is likely to be indefinite.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For what though? WPUNJ (talk) 21:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any of the recent edits where you are changing dates that aren't supported by sourced article content, as well as edits such as this.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deaths in 2022. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Renewal6 (talk) 23:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rule 3:36, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Put It on Me.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at DJ Clue. Binksternet (talk) 05:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing my I'm Bout It edits. Theyre not hurting you physically or emotionally. I have the album myself. Im including information that's from the album. Stop giving me a hard time. WPUNJ (talk) 00:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for advice/help[edit]

Hey, WPUNJ

I've noticed that you also had problems in the past with user Binksternet, just as I do now. He keeps on deleting the sections I wrote about the skits on the Busta Rhymes' songs "It's a Party" and "Do My Thing". I'm telling you all of this because I'd like to know how your situation with him ended and if he tried to get you blocked or whatever. I'm new on Wikipedia, only editing for 2 weeks, and that guy keeps on making the process harder than it already is.

I don't even know why he's so stuck up and convinced that he's the one who's right. I mean, if DJ Clue has starred in several movies, then he counts as an actor. That should be self-explanatory. Thank you in advance Thegalacticalbeast (talk) 09:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I left it alone. I removed the actor part from DJ Clue. Haven't heard from him, and I didn't want to say what I really wanted to because I didn't want to get reprimanded, and that's wrong for him to delete your skit sections. Thanks for asking. WPUNJ (talk) 03:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]