User talk:Vinson wese

Vinson wese, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Vinson wese! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 00:09, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Your recent editing history at Emmelie de Forest shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. that source does not meet the guidelines! me and BabbaQ have both reverted your changes several times. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 01:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marlene A. Eilers Koenig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royalty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I particularly liked the part[edit]

She didn't ask her subjects if they could be included in her works either... Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:32, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I generally think people who publish books need to accept that they may become persons of some public interest and that there is coverage of them, eg. here. Vinson wese (talk) 20:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for for persistent disruption of a WP:BLP. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Bishonen | talk 17:37, 18 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]