User talk:Vilecremence

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of LaruaWA11 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

April 2008[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Category:Wikipedia administrators, you will be blocked from editing. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 12:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 12:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vilecremence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unban my User:LaruaWA11 account; these sock or whatever you call them accounts will continue until it's unbanned so I can use it again. No amount of blocks shall prevent me from creating accounts in order to use this site.

Decline reason:

Threatening to continue socking will not get you an unblock. — MBisanz ^talk 12:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.