User talk:Vanished user dijnyt8jewfv8hn3rijvkw34tjkd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Adhisha4, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Adhisha4! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images[edit]

Hello, I note you have added non-free images to a number of Sri Lankan election related articles. The use of non-free images is severely restricted and so I have removed them.--obi2canibetalk contr 12:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minister of Finance (Sri Lanka)[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.

You have persistently disrupted this article over the last few months and now you are beginning an edit war. You have neither given an adequate edit summary or explanation to your edits. Either stop, or participate in a discussion on the article's talk page.--Blackknight12 (talk) 06:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As a new editor[edit]

As a new editor I urge you to read the Five pillars of Wikipedia and its Policies and guidelines. It is easy to create a new user and and start editing and think you are helping build wikipedia, but in fact many new editors just end up making disruptive edits and degrading the quality of many articles. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and therefore has very high standards to quality and information. There are many areas to wikipedia with many guidelines that help us edit articles in a consistent and proficient way, as a new editor no one expects you to know these right away but it does not help if you are not on the same page as the other full time editors as wikipedia is also a mass collaboration effort. Hence the independent removal of information, which most of your 280 edits are, go against the collaboration effort and, the effort to build wikipedia. If you don't understand something please ask about it, if you need help please ask for it, if you cant agree on something please discuss it! But if you would be so good please do not edit war. Have respect for the more experienced editors as we are all working on the same thing.--Blackknight12 (talk) 03:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kandy Electoral District (1947–1989), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 9 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Sri Lankan presidential election, 2015[edit]

--SpencerT♦C 07:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use the correct parameter[edit]

When you are editing the infobox the correct parameter for the name of the office is office. Order is the number in which the person has held that office. eg. Maithripala Sirisenais the 7th President of Sri Lanka.

  • 7th = Order
  • President of Sri Lanka = Office

You have changed the infoboxes of many articles, I ask you kindly to repair all those you have changed and should you continue please do it the right way. Thanks--Blackknight12 (talk) 05:53, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right right, I usually put the office that the person has held recently on the top. It was mostly done that way, some even had a mixture between order and office, but definitely it's not something I started! Adhisha4 (talk) 08:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PM[edit]

The prime minister is NOT the head of the cabinet, the president is - article 43 (2) of the constitution says "The President...shall be the Head of the Cabinet of Ministers". I can understand the ignorance of non-Sri Lankans, but you should know better.--obi2canibetalk contr 14:01, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Advice[edit]

Please stop making things up like you did with this edit. If you are unable to abide by Wikipedia's core content policies, please leave.--obi2canibetalk contr 19:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm PrinceSulaiman. I noticed that you recently removed some content from United National Party without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have removed the bold characters that were highlighted in the name of Maithripala Sirisena, Who was elected by the UNP. Prince Sulaiman Talk to me 10:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved the article hopefully its a better now Adhisha4 (talk) 10:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Adhisha4: Please don't change the table, the head of government is important because the Presidential Election is first election before parliament election where the head government usually wins the parliament majority each time they win the Presidential Election. --Prince Sulaiman Talk to me 11:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@PrinceSulaiman: Yes it is true that it is an important post, even still there's an error Jayawarana was not president at 89 election, and if you look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Party_(UK)#Electoral_performance or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Democratic_Party_of_Germany#Election_results it shows how the party preform in the election rather than who was head of government Adhisha4 (talk) 11:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Adhisha4: I know that Conservative Party have the similar table you created at United National Party, But there is major different in the parliamentary system which in Sri Lanka doesn't use the Westminister-style Parliamentary system, So, We have two elections in a year that is Presidential Election and Parliamentary election (after end of term for head of Government), While in Germany and UK they have different system where they have only one election (excludes local/provincial government election) within year after term expiry.--Prince Sulaiman Talk to me 11:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sadly we don't have a Westminister system, but we have a Semi-presidential system like France which has https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_(France)#Popular_support_and_electoral_record, and this is nothing to do with the head of government, its about the party preformence Adhisha4 (talk) 12:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Again French system is still different from Sri Lanka, They've got two rounds of the (Presidential Election) election in the same year. Just leave the table on United National Party as it. People who visit that article can recognise who won the most seats in Parliament there is background colour which is appeared with party's colour. If you see in 2001 election the background showed green that means UNP have won the Parliament election while the background of Kumaratunga remains blue who is the head of government that was defeated (despite her winning Presidential Election in 1999) in parliamentary election. --Prince Sulaiman Talk to me 12:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That is the way the members are elected, in a two round system instead of which we use Proportional representation, the table should say how the party preformed in the election not whose head of government (like I did with the SLFP page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lanka_Freedom_Party#Electoral_History). Regarding Presidential election happening before parliamentary ones, it doesn't necessarily have to happen in that way and head of governments before 1978 was the Prime minister not the President like now, the President back then was a ceremonial figurehead like in Present day Germany (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany#Politics) or Singapore. Regarding Maithripala Sirisena, he was not elected by the UNP, he was elected by people of the country. He was an independent common candidate who contested the election form the New Democratic front and supported by many parties including the UNP, and is currently the chairman of the SLFP. Not trying to offend you hear but you need to get the accurate information about these thing and from reliable sources, some of the information circulated within Sri Lanka is not quite accurate and Sri Lankans tend to get the wrong idea about lots of things Adhisha4 (talk) 08:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good, But the one you did at Sri Lanka Freedom Party is too mainstream, That's the reason i decided to on different way of styling the table at United National Party, Anyway it looks good on both :), I don't want any conflict of interest with you or other editors in regarding the table styling. Actually Sirisena was elected by a majority of UNP votes, If this wasn't for him, He would have been defeated by Authoritarian Rajapaksa. Thus, he has every right to keep his word (refusal on PM post for MR) that's why he is battling with Rajapaksa-loyalist within the party. He already sacked two powerful loyalists (General Secretaries Susil and Anura) of MR in UPFA and SLFP. You should also write about this on UPFA and SLFP article(s) as a history for his actions to protect his life and party from the authoritarian rule. --Prince Sulaiman Talk to me 12:42, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, at least if wew can be happy as it is Adhisha4 (talk) 12:57, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sri Lankan parliamentary election, 2015, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AntanO 18:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves[edit]

Hi there, please don't move pages as you did at Kumar Sangakkara unless it's a clear cut case. As evidences suggest, both names, Kumar Sangakkara and Kumara Chokshanada Sangakkara can be used to refer to the subject. We usually use common names as the title, however, only if it's precise. A page move would be controversial under prevailing situation. So as a precaution, please discuss on the talk page before performing a page move. Thank you. -- Chamith (talk) 03:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Alpha Monarch. Your recent edit to the page United People's Freedom Alliance appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have changed the election result, They were elected to be in the opposition, Election history can't be changed. The UPFA still remains in the opposition and the SLFP is in the government which is the main constituent of UPFA. ♔ MONARCH Talk to me 15:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alpha Monarch sorry for the late reply. In the article Parliament of Sri Lanka it did mention earlier as all the member of UPFA as government, and as a result of that I made that change to keep things consistent, but since then things have changed and I have altered the change I made. LionsRule125 (talk) 08:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

other =[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at R. Sampanthan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. obi2canibetalk contr 12:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reading[edit]

Some light reading for you:

  • Article 48 (1): " The Cabinet of Ministers functioning immediately prior to the dissolution of Parliament shall notwithstanding such dissolution continue to function and shall cease to function upon the conclusion of the General Election..."
  • Article 66: " The seat of a Member shall become vacant...upon the dissolution of Parliament..."

--obi2canibetalk contr 14:13, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok agreed, but this only applies to Elections after the 1978 Constitution, for elections before that it would be election dates. And this only applies to the end date there is no mention about the date office begins, and end dates can be found here: http://www.parliament.lk/en/duration-of-parliament LionsRule125 (talk) 10:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know that it would be election dates before 1978? Do you have evidence? Do you have WP:RS? Or are you making assumptions again, like you did before and are now correcting?
Why have you used this link to justify the election date as the date office begins? It also gives the date of the first meeting - why not this date? Are you making more assumtions? Do you understand WP:V?--obi2canibetalk contr 13:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to R. Sampanthan. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. obi2canibetalk contr 10:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More reading[edit]

WP:SYNTHESIS and WP:CIRCULAR.--obi2canibetalk contr 10:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Office infobox[edit]

Please stop adding the Prime Minister and leader of the party to the infoboxes of Sri Lankan Politicians. The Prime Minister is just a nominal position and is neither head of government or state. Leaders of parties are relatively insignificant posts compared to cabinet and diplomatic positions. The infoboxes are bloated enough, adding unnecessary information further degrades the article. And please start a discussion instead of removing sourced content.--Blackknight12 (talk) 08:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ill agree with you regarding the issue of adding Prime Minister to every every office. But it would be good to add them to Parliamentary posts such as Leader of opposition and leader of house etc. Regarding the leader of the party ill have to strongly disagree with you. If you go and have a look at countries like United Kingdom or Australia, the leader of the party is mentioned (eg. David Cameron, Malcolm Turnbull). Please don't tell me that United States don't have it because the President is not quite the leader of the party. LionsRule125 (talk) 10:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to have the perception that Sri Lanka is a colony of some other country, or you just don't understand the Sri Lankan political system. You can't compare the political systems of Sri Lanka with countries like United Kingdom, Australia or the United States. Just because they have somethings in common does not qualify the need for the Sri Lankan articles to to be the same. You are comparing two extremely different countries, cultures, political systems and politics. Sri Lanka's membership in the commonwealth does not legitimise this. I am saying this towards all your edits within the scope of Sri Lankan politics, as it is fairly evident you have not been working well with other editors during your time here.
For the issue concerning the leader of the party in infoboxes, normally I have no problem in its inclusion, however for someone like Maithripala Sirisena, who has held many high positions, higher than that of party leader, its inclusion is negligible when his inbox is overflowing and bloated with positions. We have to prioritise, International/Diplomatic offices, National offices, Provincial offices etc.--Blackknight12 (talk) 12:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The leadership of a specific political party is actually much more important than a ministerial or a diplomatic office, if you go to a wikipedia pages of partly leaders of many countries they have included the party leader in it and it makes sense, especially as a reader you would want to know whether or not he holds such positions. On the case of of having too many boxes if you look at Winston Churchill (ignoring the fact he's from Britain) he has held many ministerial and diplomatic positions, yet his position as leader of the party is just after prime minister. In regards to your accusation of me thinking our country is a colony of some country, so i do not think that at all, but!! our political culture is developed much from the British political system and we have lots of common trends as other commonwealth nations in that regard I prefer to compare wikipedia political articles from those countries, which are also well formed rather than referring to American or other European styles when it comes to wikipedia articles LionsRule125 (talk) 08:31, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:BADDATEFORMAT[edit]

Can you spot what you're doing wrong?--obi2canibetalk contr 14:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

You have been warned before about your obsessive behaviour in relation to infoboxes. Just because a field exists does not mean it has to be used. The President and Prime Minister fields should generally only be used when they appoint the subject. Even then, there is no requirement to use them. If you look at the ambassador example on Template:Infobox officeholder/example you will see that the President field has not been used even though American ambassadors are appointed by the American president.

Leader of the Opposition is parliamentary position and the President and Prime Minister have no role in their appointment. You have used Jeremy Corbyn to justify your stance, WP:Other stuff exists argument, but there are many other Leader of the Opposition articles that don't include these fields. For example, look at Sri Lanka's nearest neighbours: Sushma Swaraj (India), Syed Khurshid Ahmed Shah (Pakistan) and Rowshan Ershad (Bangladesh).

An infobox should not be a substitute for content in the body of the article. You have edited dozens of articles where you have bloated their infoboxes but added no content in the body of the article. The result is a mess. Worse, you have not provided references for the contents of the bloated infoboxes. Infoboxes are not exempt from WP:V, as WP:INFOBOXREF makes it clear.

It is a shame that I and other editors are having to waste so much of our time making you follow Wikipedia policies, guidelines and etiquette.--obi2canibetalk contr 11:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to A. H. M. Fowzie has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. obi2canibetalk contr 11:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dates[edit]

Why are you removing the exact dates? Please restore all those you have removed. Just a year is not sufficient or specific enough for an encyclopaedic article.

Well, I did initially have the exact dates. But then user obi2canibe pointed out there is no evidence for those days. I just want to keep things consistent LionsRule125 (talk) 08:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Provide evidence if you need to, but don't erode the quality of what is supposed to be an encyclopedic article with half assed editing and poor judgement. You have the option to ask for second opinions or advice, that is why WikiProjects exists.
Ok, I will consult next time. But I need to find a solution for this. I want to see consistency in all articles I generally would have put date of the election but someone seem to be unhappy with fact because in the constitution it says the membership expires when the parliament is dissolved LionsRule125 (talk) 09:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Lankan Politics Conventions[edit]

As you are an active editor of articles that are related to Sri Lankan politics, you are invited to discuss and help create a new policy towards editing these articles. Your participation in this discussion will hopefully be constructive in streamlining the development of Sri Lankan politics articles, reducing edit wars and keeping articles consistent to a agreed upon standard of quality, as well as something to refer back to. Hopefully decisions made by all user here will be final.

Discuss now: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sri Lanka#Sri Lankan Politics Conventions

Thanks--Blackknight12 (talk) 09:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Blackknight12 --LionsRule125 (talk) 09:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

If you get this message in December 2015, please get in touch. --Dweller (talk) 10:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for replying. Please will you watch this section: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cricket#Sinhalese_editors for the message I'm going to put there in a minute? --Dweller (talk) 12:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Wijayapala Mendis[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Wijayapala Mendis, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.sundaytimes.lk/121216/plus/appreciations-24-24826.html http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2012/09/02/new25.asp, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Wijayapala Mendis saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! obi2canibetalk contr 20:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Panini Ilangakoon[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Panini Ilangakoon, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=17960, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Panini Ilangakoon saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! obi2canibetalk contr 20:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: D. S. Goonesekera[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as D. S. Goonesekera, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://archives.dailynews.lk/2012/07/17/fea04.asp, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:D. S. Goonesekera saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! obi2canibetalk contr 20:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content[edit]

Please, do not remove sourced content in order to introduce something, in where you mention a primary source, which is unclear and subject to interpretation. --81.84.177.179 (talk) 07:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Vanished user dijnyt8jewfv8hn3rijvkw34tjkd. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ikhtiar H (talk) 12:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

WP:POINT[edit]

When you try to make a WP:POINT by doing this and this in retaliation for this and this, the only person who looks bad is YOU.--obi2canibetalk contr 15:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Ministry of Higher Education and Highways (Sri Lanka), you may be blocked from editing. obi2canibetalk contr 10:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address per person. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. obi2canibetalk contr 13:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Vanished user dijnyt8jewfv8hn3rijvkw34tjkd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanished_user_dijnyt8jewfv8hn3rijvkw34tjkd&oldid=1147970539"