User talk:Vanished user 08072013

Image copyright problem with Image:Abbas1.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Abbas1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Abbas prague small.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Abbas prague small.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:State small.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:State small.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rex small.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Rex small.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mb small.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mb small.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ipr-book.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ipr-book.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ed small.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ed small.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CV Full.pdf[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CV Full.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 15:26, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CV Tahir Abbas 24 May 2008.pdf[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CV Tahir Abbas 24 May 2008.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 16:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Publications Full.pdf[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Publications Full.pdf. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CV Full.pdf[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CV Full.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 10:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Abbas bw.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Abbas bw.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Publications Full.pdf[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Publications Full.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 20:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Abbas bw.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Abbas bw.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 10:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CV Full.pdf[edit]

Hello! Please check if the copyright tag that I putted is on according with what you said. If not, feel free to modify it. --Sdrtirs (talk) 11:20, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Abbas prague small.jpg[edit]

I've cleaned up the templates you use on this page. Just to confirm, 'no copyright issues whatsoever' means it is public domain? J Milburn (talk) 11:32, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Publications Full.pdf[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Publications Full.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 17:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Publications Full.pdf[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Publications Full.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Abbas prague small.jpg.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Abbas prague small.jpg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Publications full.pdf[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Publications full.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Publications Full.pdf[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Publications Full.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 09:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tahir Abbas, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:35, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tahir Abbas, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions are now being discussed here. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, whilst you (assuming you are Tahir Abbas) are clearly notable you should be aware of the policy wikipedia has about writing autobiographies: WP:AUTO. You are strongly discouraged from writing articles about yourself as it is difficult to meet other policies such as maintaining a neutral point of view when writing about yourself. Please stop editing the article yourself, if you would like another editor to add content, please place it on the talk page and add {{request edit}} on the page to draw other editors attention to it. Thanks Smartse (talk) 18:36, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I noticed above that you've had problems uploading images before. If you've got a portrait that you don't mind releasing under a creative commons licence, upload it and I will make sure that it doesn't get deleted. Message me or reply below if you't got any questions. Smartse (talk) 19:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Tahir Abbas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 08:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tahir Abbas[edit]

Hello. If you are the creator of the article Tahir Abbas, and you want to have it deleted, to request its deletion, place a {{db-g7}} tag at the top of it. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 08:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I realised that you can't use the tag in this case. Please ignore my message. Anna Lincoln 10:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that to delete an article that was modified by others, you can go to WP:AfD, then the community will discuss its deletion, but the deletion is not something you can do on your own. Please also read Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. Anna Lincoln 10:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Tahir Abbas. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 12:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Tahir Abbas. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:15, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tahir Abbas, you will be blocked from editing. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 09:25, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of alternate accounts / not being logged in[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drtahir007. Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily blocked for sock puppetry[edit]

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drtahir007, and you are therefore blocked for a period of 1 week. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires.
If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MuZemike 01:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanished user 08072013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm utterly confused about this wiki page - I am drtahir007 and I am Tahir Abbas - I want to ensure that my wiki entry is accurate and fair and does not disadvantage me in anyway professionally - I would like my page deleted - if not, then please get rid of the family and education sections - i will continue to try and get a result - apologies if i mess this system up - but the wiki editing side of things is far too complex for me to appreciate nor do i have the resources - time/energy - so please shown some support and make things easier for the users

Decline reason:

This does not address your block. You were blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Please read the guide to appealing blocks if you wish to submit another request. Smashville^talk 13:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanished user 08072013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a colleague of Dr Abbas who knows of his work. The use of certain personal information is damaging to his reputation and credibility in the profession- I suggest you please delete the site or at least take the family and education sections. I am aware it is causing considerable distress.

Decline reason:

Wait, which is it? You are Dr. Tahir or are you a colleague? Regardless, your unblock request doesn't address the reason for your block and what steps you will take to change your behavior. TN X Man 23:15, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I fixed your unblock request. Please make note, you do not alter the text in the block message, you copy and paste it into a blank area, then fill it out.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 21:59, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Blocked you indef for disruption and sockpuppetry. Secret ^account 15:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tahir Abbas article content dispute[edit]

FYI - I have removed the information in question and have posted a new case to the Biographies of Living Persons Noticeboard here. You can monitor the case there and may add comments if you like. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tahir Abbas[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tahir Abbas. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahir Abbas (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

I moved this here, so that it is in chronological order with the other messages, to assist in review. FYI. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:17, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanished user 08072013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to become unblocked as I need to make fundamentally important changes to my own BLP. I have requested the deletion of my own wiki page because it contains defamatory material that is subject to legal action. It wholly misrepresents by relying on one article and one source in that article in relation to a number of very sensitive issues that were legally bound to remain confidential, and for genuine reasons. I wish to make the necessary edits, or potentially delete the page itself. This wiki page is the first on a google search of my name, and therefore wholly damaging to my repution

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, I'm forced to decline your request. None of the reasons cited for requesting unblock (editing own article, etc) are valid reasons under our blocking policy. Further, the disruption for which you were blocked is entirely centered around the article about you - so there can be no guarantee that the disruption would cease. Quite the opposite, actually, given your stated intentions in this unblock request. Please see my additional comments, below. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Let me have a look. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:17, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is currently undergoing an Articles for deletion debate, though consensus there appears to lean toward Keeping the article. If you like, you can post a comment here and I (or another admin) will copy it to the AFD. An article won't be deleted unless it fails to comply with policy, and this article appears to satisfy all of the relevant requirements. If a statement is inaccurate, but properly sourced to a reliable publication such as Times Higher Education, for example, then we would need an equally reliable source that contradicts that statement before removing it. Unfortunately, I can find no sources that contradict the facts of that section specifically, or of the article in general. While we do not offer legal advice, I will additionally note that there is no confidentiality agreement between Wikipedia and any entity which might be related to you. So, if someone else was supposed to keep something confidential, and failed to do so, then it would seem that your recourse is with them. Hinting at legal threats does not help your cause here. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]