User talk:Vabookwriter

Welcome![edit]

Hi Vabookwriter! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Charles Louis Seeger, Sr. has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Charles Louis Seeger, Sr.. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Louis Seeger, Sr. has been accepted[edit]

Charles Louis Seeger, Sr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:09, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don't Give Up the Ship! - James Lawrence (November 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Don't Give Up the Ship! - James Lawrence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Don't Give Up the Ship! - James Lawrence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 00:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vabookwriter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 00:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Vabookwriter! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reverting incorrect editing changes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CWGC[edit]

I've moved/copied our discussion to the CWGC talkpage as it's likely best it be moved there in case others within the community are interested. All the best.--Labattblueboy (talk) 00:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have not known how to do that, and I'll participate. It's an important discussion to have, esp. as current events around war dead buried in CWGC seem to be heating up. Later. Vabookwriter (talk) 15:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Vabookwriter! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Clarification on dispute resolution, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Don't Give Up the Ship![edit]

Hello, Vabookwriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Don't Give Up the Ship!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Don't Give Up the Ship![edit]

Hello, Vabookwriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Don't Give Up the Ship!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted this article in the usual way and it was deleted by an editor for a reason above, and I determined not to go forward. Also above see the discussion about CWGC. The article currently on Wikipedia is incorrect in some information, but there is an editor who seems to have the ability to block attempts to make it correct. After active participation in and creation of +- 15 articles, I've stopped participating. I am a professional author and the process does not meet professional standards. Vabookwriter (talk) 04:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]