User talk:Tru Soulja

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sha Money Management[edit]

Hi. I'm concerned about the multiple edits you've made tonight inserting references to Sha Money Management into articles like 50 Cent and Tony Yayo. Can you provide sources for the information that 50 Cent is associated with this company and other companies like 150 Entertainment. All information in the encyclopedia should be verifiable and since you've put this information into so many articles, I'm curious about the sources. Thanks. janejellyroll 10:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your message on my talk page[edit]

Myspace.com is not a reliable source for the purposes of Wikipedia. I notice that you've created dozens of articles. May I make a suggestion? It's usually better to work on creating one article and a time and making sure it is up to Wikipedia standards of verifiability and notability (see WP:V and WP:N) before creating others. Most of the articles that you have created lack information about why the artist/producer is actually notable. It isn't enough to just say who the artist is signed with. You might also find the information at WP:MUSIC helpful. Please let me know if you have any questions. janejellyroll 10:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate Thugz Entertainment[edit]

A tag has been placed on Corporate Thugz Entertainment, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Geniac 14:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC) You said: "Hey why u want to delete this article it is a real record label u can look at any Young Jeezy site and it will tell u this." - To what sites do you refer? It would be helpful to include them in an External links or References section in the article.[reply]
"So dont delete it or i will make it again and again and again i dont care how many fake users i have 2 make" - Please don't do that. See Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. --Geniac 15:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming G-Unit Releases[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Upcoming G-Unit Releases. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Geniac 16:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:150 Ent..jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:150 Ent..jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tupac TBA[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Tupac TBA. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. See Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. NawlinWiki 18:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comment to User:SmittysOnslaught[edit]

Regarding this comment; please read Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. They are not your articles. Believing that an article has an owner of this sort is a common mistake people make on Wikipedia. --Geniac 08:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"If i created it then its mine" - I'm sorry, but you are incorrect. You agree to license your contributions under the GFDL. If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it.
"i dont care about the rules of wikipedia" - You may not care about them, but you must still follow them. --Geniac 08:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"ill edit u up out my way" - I'm sorry, but I honestly don't know what that means. --Geniac 09:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me, but what do you mean by "dont mess with me"? --Geniac 09:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Civility and participate in a respectful and civil way. Thank you. --Geniac 10:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sha Money Management[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed maintenance notices from Sha Money Management, even though required changes haven't been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. --Geniac 03:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brawrrr[edit]

Please stop editing Wikipedia, you aren't any good at it. I havent seen a SINGLE edit of yours that hasnt been reverted or COMPLETELY re-worded.64.230.40.112 12:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    • I AM THE NIGHT RIDER! Remember me when you look up at the night sky. 64.230.40.112 01:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • there is a reply on my talk page, i noticed you have a nasty habit of splitting conversations between talk pages. Which basically makes them impossible to make sense of, so lets continue our meaningful discussion on my talk page. Also, if any mods are reading this I'd like to point out that mr "True Soldier" has made veiled threats on my talk page and it's not the first time he's done so to anyone. 64.230.40.112 02:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • Wow, seriously..."dis" "dat" "mane" and "kno" are NOT words, well mane is, but not in the context that you have provided. Maybe you'd be more comfortable in a different language version of wikipedia since English OBVIOUSLY is not your first language.

Doctor's Advocate (song)[edit]

I have reverted this article to a redirect to Doctor's Advocate per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor's Advocate (song) because you reposted the same content as it had at the time of that AfD. Please do not repost the same content again without addressing the issues discussed at that AfD. Thank you. --Geniac 13:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Jibbs[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Tru Soulja! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule bebo\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slow Ya Roll[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed maintenance notices from Slow Ya Roll, even though required changes haven't been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Specifically, you removed the {{fact}} tag. Statements like "So-and-so said such-and-such." need citations. --Geniac 19:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"i was trying to edit it back to the way i originally created it" - The way you originally created it didn't follow Wikipedia:Manual of Style (titles). Italics should be used for album titles and "double quotation marks" should be used for song and single titles. --Geniac 19:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Thats not what im talkig about i didn't even put that part in that article" - In this edit, you created the article. In the first sentence of the body of the article and at the bottom of the infobox in the "Young Buck singles chronology" section, the title of the singles should be in double-quotes. Yes, you did put those parts in that article. --Geniac 19:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the confusion. I've removed it as an unsourced statement and informed the user that added it to source statements in the future. --Geniac 19:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary usage[edit]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Tellyaddict 17:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of G-Unit MidWest[edit]

An editor has nominated G-Unit MidWest, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Unit MidWest and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Meez[edit]

The article Mr. Meez has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 15:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Vince Young, you will be blocked from editing. MojoTas 02:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Preview[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 12:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article The West Kept Secret, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Geniac 05:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magneto[edit]

There has been no advancement on that film, with most of the information sepeculative. That is why it was redirected, and all the informatio merged into the comic character article. There is not enough to support an entire article by itself, especially when so much can change between now and the time that they actually start making the film.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was not a G-Unit or G-Unit Records release. It was released on Kanye West's GOOD Music label.--NPswimdude500 (Talk|Contribs) 01:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to articles/categories related to The Game[edit]

Please stop adding the category G-Unit to those articles/categories, in case you did not know, The Game has left G-Unit back in 2005, and has since started a bitter feud with them, therefore, you can not claim that The Game is part of G-Unit anymore, or anything related to them (other than the feud). Please stop adding that category to anything related to The Game, thanks, and happy editing. --- Efil4tselaer 22:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Please stop adding redirects to categories. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Corporate Thugz Entertainment, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Geniac 18:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Dlong 12:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your vandalism-clearing edit on the talk page. However, I believe you have accidentally deleted some legitimate comments. I appreciate your edit, but please take care in the future not to delete bona fide comments. Thank you. RJaguar3 01:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They're trying to delete the List of hip hop rivalries[edit]

At search, type in WP:AFD if you want to speak up about it. It's in the July 6 batch. Good luck.

Vitamin D (producer)[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Vitamin D (producer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. KenWalker | Talk 06:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mick Swagger[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Mick Swagger, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Spellcast 11:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Money Management Group[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Money Management Group, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Money Management Group. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 22:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Behind Closed Doors (Olivia album)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Behind Closed Doors (Olivia album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Behind Closed Doors (Olivia album). Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Young Hot Rod discography[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Young Hot Rod discography, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on I Got The Hood , Volume 2, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because I Got The Hood , Volume 2 is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting I Got The Hood , Volume 2, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I would like to solicit feedback concerning moving this to Adam Jones (football). It makes sense to me, but is there consensus? Please opine in the section of the article talk page. Cheers, Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 21:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Hip hop musci[edit]

I have nominated Hip hop musci (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — Σxplicit 05:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Young Hot Rod[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Young Hot Rod. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Hot Rod (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Young Money[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Young Money. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Money (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bluestar Entertainment[edit]

The article Bluestar Entertainment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: significant RS coverage cannot be found; promotional content for a non-notable music label.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]