User talk:Toma646

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Toma646, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Zbečník stream[edit]

Hello, Toma646,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Zbečník stream should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zbečník stream .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Surfer43 09:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Wait, it no done.--Toмa646 (talk) 09:15, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Zbečník stream. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  10:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Помощ с переводом[edit]

Горорят, что нету в статье авторитетных источников и что река по-видимости маленькая и незначимая. Esn (talk) 17:48, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо вам.--Toмa646 (talk) 17:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome again...[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Toma646, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Russian; did you know there is a Russian Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! Ansh666 21:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Добро пожаловать!

Здравствуйте, Toma646! Добро пожаловать в Википедию! Хотя мы и приветствуем попытки улучшения Википедии, к сожалению, Ваши правки сделаны на английском, уровень которого недостаточен для действительно полезного вклада. Кажется, Вы лучше владеете русским; знаете ли Вы о существовании русской Википедии? Возможно, Вы предпочтёте вносить вклад в её развитие. В любом случае, добро пожаловать в проект и спасибо за усилия! Ansh666 21:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Статью Zbečník stream и несколько других статьей я на русской википедии уже создал, но я хотел сделать тоже их английскую версию.--Toмa646 (talk) 09:21, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Translation) Article Zbečník stream and a few other articles on the Russian Wikipedia, I already did, but I also wanted to make them the English version. Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 22:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toma646 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Original text: Я не сделал никакие вандальские правки за всё время, что я на енвики, посмотрите мой вклад. Это всё работа моего, сейчас уже бывшего друга, который хотель выдавать себя за меня и думаль что это хорошая шутка. Я дурак, позволил эму и быть несколько часов на моём компютере и вифи. З этого списка учётных записей в Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pszczolka Maja1 мойи толька 2 → Toma646, Včelka Mája (Toma646). Мой вклад в енвики очень малый, потому что нe владею английским языком, но думаю что блокировать эты 2 учётные записы, которые я имею польностью под контролом (никто не знает пароль), не нужное.

I never vandalised Wikipedia, since my coming here, please see my contributions. It all work of my former friend, who wanted impersonate me and he thought, that it will be good joke. He was many hours on my computer and connected on my wifi. From it list of socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pszczolka Maja1 are my just 2 accounts → Toma646 and Včelka Mája (Toma646). My edits are small, because i dont good speak English, but i think, that blocking of these 2 accounts, under wchich my former friend never edited (i controled it) and he dont know password, longer blocking not needed.

Decline reason:

As I understand your request (the English is not good), a friend has had access to your account. The account is therefore compromised and cannot be unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Vejvančický Zda se ti ten překlad v tom unblock srozumitelny? Inak na enwiki edituju naprosto minimalně a moje překlady Google převodnikem asi taki nikoho neohromjěj (a spiš přidělaj praci) a enwiki vubec nerozumim, takže pro mě to nijak omezujici ani neni.--Тома646 (diskuse) 17. 3. 2014, 17:21 (UTC)

Cenzurovano na moji diskuzi neni jen todle, inymu kolegoj sem zas smazal odkaz na jeho Fejsbuk, gde ho šlo lehko dohledat. De o to neinspirovat ničim vandaly, aby se todle nemohlo mě nebo někomu inymu stát znova.--Тома646 (diskuse) 17. 3. 2014, 17:21 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toma646 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Original text: Простите плохой перевод, я хотел сказать наоборот, что друг не имееть доступа к учётной записи и не знает пароль. Когда бы знал пароль, делал бы вандальские правки тоже под этим, но его учётные записи уж были заблокированые безсрочно. Посмотрите мой вклад, в нем ни одна вандалская правка, но у его учётных записей вандалские все.
Мог бы этот посмотреть кто нибудь, кто понимает русский?

Excuse me for bad translation, I wanted say that nobody, nor former friend dont know my password to account Toma646. If he knew my password, he perhaps do unconstructive edits too under account Toma646 and his accounts are blocked indefinitely. See my contributions, in my contribs nor one vandal edit, may be there some uncosnstructive edits, but none vandal, do with bad intent. Friends accounts have just vandal edits. Can rewiev this unblock request somebody, who understand Russian language?Toмa646 (talk) 22:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per WP:GOTHACKED, this account will not be unblocked. Also, ALL communication on the English Wikipedia must be in English, and competence in this language is a requirement DP 09:28, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed the obscenities (in broken Czech) you added to this talk page. I'll report you at WP:AIV if it happens again. Thanks for your understanding. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 08:27, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because my english is more better than previously, i improve translation. For verification, that i not lie i let original russian text, if you dont speak Russian, ask somebody who russian understand, if can verify, that i not changed original message.--Toмa646 (talk) 10:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toma646 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I confess to everything. I not will longer lie, all account in SPI are my, including all these from 6. march and Pszczolka Maja1. And how all started: When i started vandalise enwiki, i was very active vandalfighter on cswiki, i reverted many vandalisms every day. I never vandalise Wikipedia before it, but when i was every day in contact with many vandals and vandalisms, i wanted try vandalise too, just try. My first target was article abou my favourite serial Maya the Honey Bee and vandalising was fun for me. I still vandalised articles about Maya the Bee and i wanted know, how you stop me and you stopped me in my first SPI. After block of my main account Toma646 i was wait to unblock and here two declined unblock requests, all admins was tell me, that my account never will be unblocked and i solved it so that i created new account Дед Мороз1 and i start do helpful contribs, i wanted show with this account, that is end of fun and i want again contribute constructively and i thought that it will help me to unblocking. When i admitted, that i Toma646, JamesBWatson blocked it account indefinitely, deleted all my new articles created under it account and revoked my talk page acces, because i writed here something in czech, it was message for other czech user Vejvančický. After it i was very angry and starded round of it: I created new account, created new article, vandalise from rage and revenge (mainly userpages and talkpages of admins, who blocked me), i am was blocked, created again new account and do it again and again. And often i created new account just for vandalising for fun. And started second SPI and my, more than 40 accounts was again checked and DoRD blocked my used ranges of IP on 3 months. It was made more difficult block evasion, and when i not on some wifi, i cannot edit and i cannot edit most of time. Then it i stopped edit to revenge and desperately enforce my useful or vandal contribs. I understood, that havent sense contribute constructively and i just vandalised (my best work), after expire of CU rangeblocks i haved more opportunities and new CU rangeblock not been so hard. I vandalised, and do it just for fun and in my last vandalisms was my main target userpages and talkpages of two users, Vejvančický and Marek Koudelka, it was not been for revenge, it was just for fun, my fun and it was entertain to these users (i thought, that it will be funny too for they). It is cswiki version of template here: You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia or it. It was very expensive fun and now i must paid it. And why i devised my friend? I wanted confuse it long time ago, but on cswiki one admin (Zdenekk2) tell, that if is true, that accounts in SPI from 6. march are my, i will be blocked indefinitely too on my homewiki cswiki. I musted keep it in secrecy, because it can been my end on cswiki. Before 2 months i stopped edit enwiki after agreement with user Secret (on IRC Aranda), we agreed, that if i stopped edit enwiki and evase my block, she will with admins discuse about my unblocking. After month i not unblocked, but this agreement i comply more just 1 month, to today and if you dont tell me, that i never be unblocked, i will comply it farther to my unblocking, but if i should it withstand and not go back to block evasion and socking, i must have got some chance to unblock, it will me very help in it. I understand that i do bad things, i was cannot resist temptation try vandalise Wikipedia. Now, after many months i want start again, better. If i will here unblocked, it will help me too on commons, where admin User:INeverCry tell, that socking here is big problem to unblocking me on commons. And my english is more better, beceuase when i evased block here, i learned together English. My SUL. You can see, that i not abuse my talkpage, nor on other wikiprojects i not do new socks (last created more than month ago on commons and on commons i too wait to unblocking without block evasion). If you not unblock me, please shorten this block to 1-6 months and i will wait to expire of this block and i not will evase block. When i will unblocked, i want write or improce articles or add pictures.--Toмa646 (talk) 17:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We do not unblock accounts that have been compromised. You are repeating yourself. Please do not re-use the unblock template unless you have new information. Chillum 19:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Chillum - I improved translation in prior unblock requests for better understanding, that my account Toma646 was hecked is one big misunderstanding, because i used to translation google translator and this translator in translations from czech to english often can turn meaning of some sentences and words. My account never been hecked, it can testify users: User:Vejvančický, User:Marek Koudelka or Filelakeshoe. And you can ask somebody who understand russian, if verify rightness of translation and that i not altered meaning of original message.--Toмa646 (talk) 10:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And i just talk and not do nothing helpful. When i you will wait, i improve one article.--Toмa646 (talk) 11:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pszczolka_Maja1/Archive it seems you were indeed abusing multiple accounts. I am not going to unblock you. Chillum 15:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Chillum - But i stopped do socks here. Nobody not want unblock me, and nobody give me chance to new start, and it is reason, why i do socks. After 10 years, when i do new unblock request this 10 years old socking will reason for my longer blocking?--Toмa646 (talk) 15:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Second chance for better start, it i never havent, my first block was indef block.--Toмa646 (talk) 15:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When you unblock me, if not today.--Toмa646 (talk) 15:45, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Secret - Hi, Aranda. you know me from IRC there you have name Aranda. Admins thought, that i will abuse my talkpage. I not do it, nor evase block. I not evase block more than 2 months and my longer blocking not needed. Please see my last unblock request.--Toмa646 (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toma646 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please see my last unblock request, there is all. Now it is 3 months since my last block evasion. I think, that its enough long time. Try trust me.Toмa646 (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Leaving aside the concerns about abusing multiple accounts, to be honest, based on the level of English language in your last unblock request, I'm not entirely convinced that you should be editing the English language Wikipedia. I notice that you have an account on the Simple English Wikipedia, and that an admin on that wiki has moved a page that you created to your user space as the English wasn't very clear. My advice would be to continue editing the Simple English Wikipedia, and to improve your English, before making another unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zbečník[edit]

Extended content
{{Geobox | Settlement
<!-- *** Heading *** -->
| name               = Zbečník
| other_name         = 
| category           = Village
<!-- *** Image *** -->
| image              = Zbečník.JPG
| image_caption      = 
<!-- *** Symbols *** -->
| flag               = 
| symbol             = 
<!-- *** Name *** -->
| etymology          = 
| official_name      = 
| motto              = 
| nickname           = 
<!-- *** Country etc. *** -->
| country            = Czech Republic
| country_flag       = 1
| state              = 
| region             = [[Hradec Králové Region|Hradec Králové]]
| region_type        = [[Regions of the Czech Republic|Region]]
| district           = [[Náchod District|Náchod]]
| district_type      = [[Districts of the Czech Republic|District]]
| commune            = Náchod
| municipality       = Hronov
<!-- *** Family *** -->
| part               = 
| river              = 
<!-- *** Locations *** -->
| location           = 
| elevation          = 
| coordinates        = {{coord|50|28|50|N|16|10|06|E|display=inline,title}}
| capital_coordinates = 
| mouth_coordinates  = 
| highest            = 
| highest_elevation  = 
| lowest             = 
| lowest_elevation   = 
| area               = 
| area_round         = 
<!-- *** Population *** -->
| population         = 1029
| population_date    = 2011
| population_density = 
<!-- *** History & management *** -->
| established        = 1359
| established_type   = 
| mayor              = H
<!-- *** Codes *** -->
| timezone           = [[Central European Time|CET]]
| utc_offset         = +1
| timezone_DST = [[Central European Summer Time|CEST]]
| utc_offset_DST     = 
| postal_code        = 
| area_code          = 
| code               = 
<!-- *** Free frields *** -->
| free               = 
<!-- *** Maps *** -->
| map                = Czechia - outline map.svg
| map_background     = Czechia - background map.png
| map_caption        = Location in the Czech Republic
| map_locator        = Czechia
<!-- *** Websites *** -->
| commons            = 
| statistics         =
| website            = http://vseprozbecnik.webnode.cz/o-nas/
<!-- *** Footnotes *** -->
| footnotes          = 
}}

'''Zbečník''' is a [[village]] in north-eastern [[Bohemia]], [[Czech Republic]], approximately 5 kilometers from the border with [[Poland]]. It is 3 km long village and part of town [[Hronov]]. 

The oldest known written evidence of Zbečník dates to the 15th century, where the (now defunct) fortress of Quicken is mentioned, located on a hill above Zbečník. 
[[File:ZBECNIK 5.jpg|thumbnail|Zbečník square.]]
== Geography ==
Zbečník stretches along the main road through the [[Zbečník stream]] valley and adjoins the town of [[Hronov]], to the east.  The stream flows through the village and joins the river [[Metuje]] at Hronov. On the the north of the village is hill [[Maternice]], a mountain that rises 567 [[meters above sea level]], on this mountain is source of drink water, named [[Skalákova studánka]]. On southern slopes of Zbečník valley we can see sandstone formed in trias. In early 20. century was here attempts quarry black coal, whose bearings is under surface of Maternice hill. Here was two aditts (named Hermína and Jiráskův důl). Hermína was on Maternice hill and Jiráskův důl on foot of Jírova hill. Because here was enough complexilly geological structure, extraction of black coal not started.

=== Climate ===
As Zbečník is in a valley it experiences greater climatic extremes than nearby towns and villages. It is prone to colder winter temperatures, dropping to -20 [[°C]] to -30 °C and hottest summer days come up to 30 °C - 35 °C.

== Industry ==
In Zbečník are companies TAMADEX, Jirka a spol., Rony Elektronik, Rotomotor, Jaroslav Pařízek-Zámečnictví (Jaroslav Pařízek-Locksmithing), CES-EKO, Milan Mifek-Allforsat.cz, DAMA-Pokrývačství (thatching), Klempířství-Pokrývačství Daneš Fiala (tinsmithery and thatching), Řeznictví uzenářství Klicnar (butcher shop). Most known and most important company here is [[Wikov MGI]], factory producing [[gearboxes]].

== Transport ==
[[File:Hranice Hronov - Zbečník.jpg|thumbnail|Railway crossing in Zbečník behind border between Hronov and Zbečník.]]
Zbečník not near some very important road or railway. Via lower Zbečník going railway numer [[Railway 026|026]], but Zbečník havent railway station. On Zbečník is just bus transport and it ensures companies [[CDS Náchod]] and [[ICOM]]. From Zbečník is bus lines to Hronov (some lines to Hronov railway station) and [[Červený Kostelec]] (mostly of buses end on Railway station in Červený Kostelec and from here you can transfer to long-distance trains [[Prague]] - [[Trutnov]]). Intervals of buses are approximately 30 minutes in weekday and 2 hours in weekend to both directions (Hronov or Červený Kostelec).

=== Bus stations in Zbečník ===
* Zbečník, Wikov (just in direction to Hronov)
* Zbečník, pošta
* Zbečník, U dvou líp
* Zbečník, hostinec
* Zbečník, Pustiny

== Akce Zbečník ==
Akce Zbečník is name for biggest building project. It is include construction of [[sewerage]], and after it reconstruction of roads, walkways and lights. When was inserted sewer system, together was reconstructed (replaced) [[water pipes]]. Project will be finished 31. august 2015. Estimated cost of it will be 155 [[Milion|milions]] [[Czech crown|czech crowns]]. 
<gallery>
File:Akce_Zbečník5.jpg|New water pipes.
Akce_Zbečník6.jpg|Sinks for wastewater.
</gallery>

== Conjuction with Hronov ==
With it idea came Hronov. Hronov wanted draw in neigbour villages to conjuction with him. Hronov promised improve of social situation and bigger wages, mainly for laborers and officers. First tryes of obtaining of neigbour villages Hronov started in [[1941]], when was in Hronov town hall invited majors of neighbour villages. Hronov promised building of watter supply system and sewerage system. Later was in Zbečník [[referendum]] about conjuction with Hronov. 58,1[[%]] residents was for conjuction, 41,9% against it. According to then times laws it musted confirm too Zbečník committee, so that for conjuction must be 2/3 (66%) of his members. Zbečník committee not confirmed conjuction with Hronov, 10 members was agreed, 12 was against. After coming of comunism was kicked out from Zbečník committe members, againts comunism ideology and they was replaced by reliable communists and they approved conjuction with Hronov, for conjuction was all members of Zbečník committee.

== Similar pages ==
*[[Zbečník stream]]
*[[Jírova hill]]
*[[Hronov]]

== References ==
*[[:cs:Zbečník|Zbečník on Czech Wikipedia]]
*[http://vseprozbecnik.webnode.cz/o-nas/ Official website of Zbečník]
*[http://ovzbecnik.webnode.cz/o-nas/ Website ]
<references />

{{commons category|Zbečník}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Zbecnik}}

Comment about the above article[edit]

  • The above article is interesting, however I don't understand some of the sentences. For example, I don't understand the sentence "With it idea came Hronov." PhilKnight (talk) 18:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]