User talk:Timard Gordon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Timard Gordon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kaizenify (talk) 09:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Timard Gordon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kaizenify (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

iMac (Intel-based) edits question

This may not be the proper place to ask this, but I was wondering why you undid my edits on the iMac (Intel-based) page. If you look at the boxes that were previously there, there was a lot of unneeded clutter. He had 3 separate boxes with exactly the same information, shouldn't that be combined into one if it is the same information? Much of the text I removed was unneeded, nobody reading the page would need to see all of that. Simply knowing that it is possible to do it would be enough for them to find the tool in question. Just wanted to see why it was undone completely, and without any note on revision or what was undone. There has to be a midpoint we can reach, if you think the information on my edit was too little.

Retta283 (talk) 03:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit war with the bot, which is applying our WP:Non-free content criteria and resizing the image per our accepted policies and guidelines - see WP:IMAGERES. Edit-warring is likely to get you in trouble - see WP:WAR. If you think this image needs a larger size than our policies generally permit, and you believe you can justify it, then start a discussion at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions or Wikipedia talk:Non-free content and try to get consensus for it. Thank you. -- Begoon 07:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I recently restored the attempted move you made on Mac OS X 10.2Talk: Mac OS X Jaguar. In future, if a redirect exists in the place you're trying to move an article, please request the move to be made at WP:RM/TR. Special permissions are required to move pages without leaving redirects. — IVORK Talk 01:20, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on

that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Begoon 11:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Look, I get that you think these images should be larger, but I've explained above what you can do about that. Wikipedia takes copyright and its non-free content rules very seriously and it honestly isn't going to end well if you just keep stubbornly edit-warring and reverting to non-policy compliant versions.

    Please stop doing that now and open a discussion as requested if you want to get consensus for an exception. What you are doing is not going to help you, and it would be a silly thing to get blocked over when starting a discussion and doing things the right way is so easy... -- Begoon 11:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators noticeboard

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Begoon 13:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Timard Gordon. The report about you is at this link. You've been reverting some images that were tagged for size reduction under our WP:Non-free content policy. For example, File:OS X Mountain Lion Screenshot.jpg. This interferes with the work of the Wikipedia people who work on images. The next time you do this you are risking a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to revert images

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

since you continued to revert at one of the images in dispute in spite of my warning above. EdJohnston (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timard Gordon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Don't block again in Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

The block was appropriate. You have given no reason to believe otherwise. WP:GAB will help you understand how to craft a reasonable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ANI, again

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Begoon 03:17, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The ANI discussion took place at this link. EdJohnston (talk) 00:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:TF! logo 2001.svg

Thanks for uploading File:TF! logo 2001.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:TF! logo September 1997.svg

Thanks for uploading File:TF! logo September 1997.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:TFOU January 2007.svg

Thanks for uploading File:TFOU January 2007.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate posting of personal information in articles

Don't post comments about Wikipedia editors in articles, as you did at TFOU, and don't post links to publicise their web pages on other sites. JBW (talk) 22:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

I see that you have been linking Wikipedia articles to image files which you have posted to Wikimedia Commons claiming that they are your "own work", despite the fact that they are company logos, and not your own work. If you continue to make false claims about copyright you are likely to be blocked from editing. JBW (talk) 22:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:TFOU TV.svg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:TFOU TV.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MrClog (talk) 11:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:TFOU January 2007.svg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:TFOU January 2007.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MrClog (talk) 11:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:TFOU 2007.svg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:TFOU 2007.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MrClog (talk) 11:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent disruptive editing

  • If you continue with your disruptive editing, you will be blocked from editing. If so, you may expect the block to be for a considerably longer time than the short token block that happened last time, since you have shown that such a short block does not achieve its intended purpose of prompting you to start taking notice of messages and editing in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Unacceptable editing practices include, but are not limited to: edit-warring; removing templates about copyright problems without dealing with the problems; adding comments about yourself to articles, or any other comments not about the topic of the article; posting promotional links to your or anyone else's personal web page; uploading files without proper copyright information.
  • Please state exactly what other account or accounts you have used. JBW (talk) 15:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TFOU, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucky Star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:TF1 March 2020.svg

Thanks for uploading File:TF1 March 2020.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:La Chaîne Info (logo).svg

Thanks for uploading File:La Chaîne Info (logo).svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:TF1 Séries Films.svg

Thanks for uploading File:TF1 Séries Films.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:TMC logo.svg

Thanks for uploading File:TMC logo.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:La Chaîne Info (logo).svg

Thanks for uploading File:La Chaîne Info (logo).svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 22:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:BBC Online partial screenshot 2021.png

Thanks for uploading File:BBC Online partial screenshot 2021.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BBC Online partial screenshot 2021.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BBC Online partial screenshot 2021.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hey Duggee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Group.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Information icon Hello, EvergreenFir here. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hey Duggee, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not change sourced information to something that contradicts that source as you did on Hey Duggee EvergreenFir (talk) 16:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you thanked me for my revert and restored the incorrect content? Why? EvergreenFir (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Warning Do not add incorrect information to Wikipedia. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 19:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timard Gordon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here Timard Gordon (talk) 21:10, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 22:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To reviewing admin: the block was for repeated insertion of demonstrably incorrect (contradictory to provided RS) airdates 2 times ([1], [2]) after being alerted to the error. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 16:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timard Gordon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2021

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at BBC Two '1991–2001' idents, you may be blocked from editing. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 19:02, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk: Timard Gordon, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 11:53, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 00:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timard Gordon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 19:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  EvergreenFir (talk) 00:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]