User talk:Thesocialsocietyus

This is Thesocialsocietyus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navarro W. Gray (August 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Navarro W. Gray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 22:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thesocialsocietyus, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 22:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

There is also a Tropical music taskforce if you are more interested on learning/working on tropical music-related articles. Best – jona ✉ 17:30, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated insertion of attorney's name[edit]

Your repeated insertion of the name of an attorney into articles related to Fetty Wap gives the feel that you are just trying to promote the attorney. Can you give a valid, policy-based reason for all the name-dropping? —C.Fred (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cfred: Hello - thanks for reaching out to me. I am adding this information to the artist(s) pages in order to protect the artist from legal ramifications that can arise when legal representation and credits are not properly noted. All the information is factual and verifiable (proof can be provided if necessary). --Thesocialsocietyus (talk) 16:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are no legal ramifications of not mentioning an artist's legal counsel in a Wikipedia article about some of the artist's work. Please do not re-add these. MPS1992 (talk) 17:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this makes no sense; we're dealing with here is a promotional account. I am also deleting Draft:Navarro W. Gray, which Jimfbleak had removed before. The kinds of claims to fame made in there are in fact potential BLP violations, given that we have no way of ascertaining that the subject is himself on the up and up, and associating this subject with known persons from the music industry may carry within it and without it serious risks of misrepresentation, malrepresentation, or overrepresentation. Orangemike, I see you blocked the user for their name; that's good, and thanks, but there's more to it than that: we have an editor who is here to promote themselves. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 17:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]